Bad Juju! You no logged in or no introduced to the frogman. Log-in or register. Or suffer mucho hoo-doos.
Agence France Press does not know the basics of ballistic

«« December 2007 • Archive: January 2008 • February 2008 »»



8 years, 11 months, 3 weeks, 5 days, 9 hours, 54 minutes ago...

Drop your government and get down on your knees
Print × Imprimerthe dissident frogman • Friday, January 25, 2008 · 2013 zulu time.pdf

I guess that's all you can expect, when you pot-smoke yourself to soft-a** social-democratic death while keeping the gates of multicultural Hell wide open:
Holland 'governed by fear of Islam'

A politician has warned that a "fear of Islam" is governing Holland after he delayed the release of a short film attacking the Koran.

Geert Wilders, 44, the leader of the Dutch Freedom Party, who compares the Muslim holy book to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, sparked government panic after saying the anti-Islam film would be released tomorrow.
I find the comparison with Mein Kampf quite unfair to Mr. Hitler: he was far less prone to self-serving contradictions and illiterate ramblings than Mr. Mohammed with his Koran, but I get Mr. Wilders' point.

Oh and that fear of Islam is not just governing Holland, but extends to the rest of the once mighty Europa, British Isles included, unfortunately.

You've got to love the Dutch government's crisis management strategy though :
Iran's parliament, the Majlis, this week warned of "extensive repercussions from Muslims throughout the globe" if the film was broadcast.

In an attempt to defuse tensions, the Dutch government will tomorrow announce that it will not implement a ban on the Islamic burqa dress.
Which of course is pointless; it should be obvious by now that the only thing that can ever defuse "Muslims throughout the globe" is for Holland — and the rest of the globe — to drop its legal, judicial, constitutional, cultural and political systems, and submit to Sharia law.

Of course, come to think of it, "not implementing a ban on the burqa dress" could be seen as a first step in that direction.

The smell of soiled Dutch underwear in the morning.

Smells like... Well, Dhimmitude.



The following motion picture video may offend your sensibility by stirring 3:31 minutes of racial hatred.

Want a refund? Yeah, try me.

In the light of the recent racket around British laws and courts' breakthrough in reenacting Orwell's worst Orwellian nightmares, at least when it comes to specious smoke screens for tyranny such as "hate speech", "defamation of (a certain) religion", and an outrageous disposition to hear cases brought forth by various Islamic libel tourists and other "stirring of racial hatred", I was hoping I could leverage the accompanying videotaped evidence to successfully sue Rowan Atkinson, the full Monty (Pythons), their writers and producers and live happily ever after, sunbathing on mattresses full of Her Majesty's banknotes with Her Majesty's face on them, in a faraway tropical island surrounded by swarms of exotic beauties with little clothes on. And margaritas à profusion.

I was prepared to argue that this would have been quite a small compensation for the prejudice of being pictured, on the sole account of being French, as a blathering hysterical homosexual with a béret basque and a small penis — and on British television and US silver screens to top it all.

You see, I never wore a béret basque, even for kicks(1). In fact, you'd sooner see me hanging out with the Hezbollah's Boy Band than put on this ridiculous piece of clothing that instantaneously makes one look like one's been milking a very sick cow that couldn't hold it any longer.

If those of you who still know what a cow looks like can forgive the picture.

Alas, considering a no less recent resolution by the International Dictator's Club and Political Branch of the Global Islamic Conquest (sometimes shortened by the stealthier and less alarming nickname of "United Nations") it would seem that my libel tourism trip only stands a chance, really, if the aforementioned hate speech applies to one religion, and one religion only.

Apparently, in addition to being only one God (and Mo being his prophet), there is only one religious offense, and that is the preposterous propagandist invention of "islamophobia".

There go my dreams of living off the British Court-ordered generosity of some among the most famous British entertainers.

Then again, Britain always lives up to its reputation of being a land of opportunity for us libel tourists, this time courtesy of a woman, no less, Miss Home Secretary Jaqui Smith(2):
Ministers have adopted a new language for declarations on Islamic terrorism.

In future, fanatics will be referred to as pursuing "anti-Islamic activity".

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said that extremists were behaving contrary to their faith, rather than acting in the name of Islam.

Security officials believe that directly linking terrorism to Islam is inflammatory, and risks alienating mainstream Muslim opinion.

The alleged terror attack on Glasgow Airport last summer: The Government is renaming Islamic terrorism as 'anti Islamic activities'

In her first major speech on radicalisation, Miss Smith repeatedly used the phrase "anti-Islamic".

In one passage she said: "As so many Muslims in the UK and across the world have pointed out, there is nothing Islamic about the wish to terrorise, nothing Islamic about plotting murder, pain and grief.

"Indeed, if anything, these actions are anti-Islamic'.
Of course, some of us happen to disagree with that latest bout of cultural suicide and taxpayer funded march towards Dhimmitude(3), with the notable exception of the thousands of us already killed at the cries of "Allah is the greatest", and therefore finding themselves in a completely neutral position on the issue (or any other, for that matter) what with being completely dead and all.

Right on you say, but wait, how does that make Britain a land of opportunity for the libel tourist? (wonders, hypothetically, the less enterprising minds in the audience.)

Easy. Follow my train of thought, if you can:

a. Mark Steyn was "summoned to appear before two Canadian Human Rights Commissions on vague allegations of (…) being "flagantry Islamophobic"(4), for speaking out (writing, actually) against Islamic terrorism, basically.

b. Under the new British Government Official Terminology Relating to Islamic Terrorism, Islamic terrorism is neither Islamic or terrorism, but "anti-islamic activity".

From which we can deduce that:

a. Speaking out against the anti-islamic activities formerly known as Islamic terrorism confirms Mark Steyn as a dedicated islamophile.

b. Ergo, attacking Mark Steyn for taking a courageous stand against anti-islamic activists (formerly known as Islamic terrorists) exposes these two Canadian Human Rights Commissions, as well as the non-profit (you wish) Canadian Islamic Congress which initiated the complaint, as vicious and dangerous islamophobic entities and organization.

Conclusion: approach Mark Steyn and offer legal counsel, fill a complaint in British courts, sue Canada and fill mattresses with Canadian Dollars(5).

I understand some of them even have Her Majesty's face on.



9 years, 5 days, 5 hours, 55 minutes ago...

Reuters: c’mon, let’s shake a leg
Print × Imprimerthe dissident frogman • Wednesday, January 16, 2008 · 1412 zulu time.pdf

I'm telling you, if Reuters corporate identity guidelines are any indication of the mindset that drives them, it certainly explains a lot about their news "reporting".

As you can see, it seems that in their merry world of politically correct social-islamic news manufacturing, all "disabled" people have wheels, but "women" cannot possibly wear skirts.

Plus, they only have one leg, which is pretty much the only way you can differentiate the ladies restroom from the blokes crapper.

Or maybe it's women and "one-legged cripples of indeterminate gender" restroom.

Must be wonderful working there.
Top Page 1 / 1 pages
You << January 2008 >> Categories

Today January 18, 2017

You're either not logged in, or not registered as a member.

Or you're just a Smelly Socialist.

So which one is it?

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31