Bad Juju! You no logged in or no introduced to the frogman. Log-in or register. Or suffer mucho hoo-doos.

The Bar

Have a drink and talk about:

The Noble Puff Piece Prize Returns
the dissident frogman | Fri, October 09, 2009 | Permalink | 7345 hits

Post

You're not logged-in, so your comment will be held for approval; check the "Help" tab for details.

Vous n'avez pas ouvert de session, votre commentaire doit être approuvé avant publication; voyez "Aide" pour les détails.


Comment form

Red-framed fields required. Email address will NOT be published or shared but may be used for a direct answer, on my part only.

Les champs bordés de rouge sont requis. L'adresse email ne sera PAS publiée ou partagée mais pourra être utilisée pour une réponse directe, de ma part seulement.


Guidelines | consignes

DISCLAIMER: in my experience, the following doesn't apply to 99% of my readership. Unfortunately, experience also shows it has to be written down for the remaining 1%.

The short version, when it comes to my comments policy, goes down to a line taken from the (mediocre) second opus of the Matrix:

"I built this place. Down here, I make the rules."

Let's elaborate a bit:

  1. Try to stay on topic. If you have a beef against the cow-fart(1) induced climate change and this post is about monkey spanking(2), then it's not the place to draw your sword(3).
    I have nothing against a freewheeling conversation, but if it's off-topic AND stupid or offensive, then it will have a badly limited lifespan.
  2. Consider the two following statements…
    • I'm totally open-minded when it comes to rational ideas.
    • It is quite obvious that Anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, Islamism, Nationalism, Racism, Collectivism(4) and Multiculturalism (non-exhaustive list) exist in complete contradiction with Reason.
    … And guess the total amount of tolerance you can expect from me if you indulge in any of these.
  3. If you shall persist in these ways nevertheless, understand that I'm not spending countless hours of work on this site to "reach out", "debate" with you, "understand" your "root causes" or "learn" about your religion. Unlike race, ideology is something we choose, and for which we must bear all responsibilities. I loathe your sick mindset and what you defend and promote. I've heard all your pitiful excuses for your despicable totalitarian psyche and your compulsion to coerce or enslave your fellow men and women in the name of some "greater good".
    So understand that this is not a public forum: it is my outpost in the culture war you wage against me, my kin, my rights and my freedom — thus, you will only be tolerated here, and only if I decide so. I call the shots and I owe you nothing. As a matter of fact, I don't like having you around, so the only argument you're truly entitled to hear from me would come, if you insist, amplified through the barrel of my Sig-Sauer high powered rifle(5) — because when it comes to intolerant scumbags, I'm an intolerant bastard.
    So keep your distances, and nobody gets hurt.
  4. I also have a very limited patience for social-democrats of all race and creed, center-of-center jellyfish and buttermonkey(6) hybrids, Blame-America-First (and always) Libertarians (usually of the Rothbardian school), Hollywood idiots & Festival-de-Cannes cretins and those Parisians who fancy themselves as an elite when they are nothing but the developed world's rednecks(7). However, I tend to ignore them, so they may consider themselves lucky if they manage to draw some sarcasm in colorful language from me.
  5. Yeah, and don't get me started on journalists and the Wonderful World of Mainstream Media...
  6. American and British soldiers (including the Commonwealth) stand on a special pedestal in my personal pantheon. Disrespect them here, and you'll quickly wish you'd rather stand naked in Mecca during Hajj, wearing only a sign that reads "Muhammad was a pedophile".
  7. I may moderate, remove or edit anything and give neither excuses nor explanations. It has nothing to do with "censorship": I am not a State, you are not a coerced citizen of said State and so you are always free to express yourself on your own facility and by your own means. Commenting is not a right, it is a privilege I grant or take away, according to my right as the owner of this place.
  8. My site is not awfully biased: it's shamelessly opinioned. If you're on my side, you get my vote and are free to rant 'n' roll. If not, live with it or go rot in the gutter.
  9. Oh and, if you're a vegan, be advised that I hunt, kill, cook(8) and eat all sorts of animals, and thoroughly enjoy the whole lot of it. Have fun with your carrots, Doc.
  1. Ha ha. Beef. Cow. Geddit?
  2. It's been known to happen.
  3. Neither is the guestbook by the way.
  4. That includes of course all its variations: Socialism, National-Socialist, Communism, Fascism, etc.
  5. With a loud 'Bang'
  6. Nope, don't know what species is that either, but it does sound like a particularly vile creature, doesn't it?
  7. Tell me London, New-York, Sydney or Tokyo, but Paris is a dump.
  8. Frequently in some sort of wine sauce or with loads of tears-pulling spices. Grapes and pepper count as veggie stuff right?

AVERTISSEMENT : selon mon expérience, ce qui suit ne s'applique pas à 99% de mes lecteurs. Malheureusement, l'expérience prouve aussi qu'il faut que cela soit écrit pour le pourcentage restant.

La version courte, concernant ma politique pour les commentaires, se résume à une ligne tirée du second (médiocre) volet de Matrix:

"J'ai construit cet endroit. Ici, je fais les lois."

Élaborons un brin :

  1. Il existe une subtile différence entre "être familier" et "traiter familièrement". Cela signifie que les culs-sales qui s'imaginent débarquer ici et me tutoyer comme si nous avions gardé les piquets de grève ensemble verront leur contribution à la conversation éradiquée sans autre forme de procès. Quelle que soit la pertinence de ladite contribution. Même si vous n'êtes Vraiment Pas Content® avec ce que j'écris, cela ne vous dispense pas de surveiller vos manières : tant que je n'ai pas été présenté à votre chère Maman, nous nous vouvoierons. Vu ?
  2. Évitez le hors-sujet. Si vous avez une rancune à l'égard de l'impact des pets de vache sur le changement climatique et que cet article traite de la fessée de macaque(1), alors ce n'est pas l'endroit d'où lancer votre croisade (2).
    Je n'ai rien contre une conversation à bâtons rompus, mais si c'est hors-sujet ET stupide ou insultant, ça aura une durée de vie salement limitée.
  3. Considérez les deux affirmations suivantes...
    • J'ai une ouverture d'esprit totale en ce qui concerne toutes idées rationnelles.
    • Il est évident qu' Anti-américanisme, anti-Sémitisme, Islamisme, Nationalisme, Racisme, Collectivisme(3) et Multiculturalisme (liste non-exhaustive) existent en complète contradiction avec la Raison.
    ... Et tâchez de devinez la dose totale de tolérance que vous pouvez attendre de moi si vous cédez à l'une de ces sirènes.
  4. Si vous deviez cependant persister dans ces voies, comprenez que je ne dépense pas un nombre incalculable d'heures de travail sur ce site pour vous "tendre la main", "débattre" avec vous, "comprendre" vos "causes profondes" ou "apprendre à connaitre" votre religion. Contrairement à la race, l'idéologie est le résultat de nos choix, et nous devons en supporter l'entière responsabilité. J'abhorre votre mentalité tarée, et ce que vous défendez et promouvez. J'ai entendu toutes vos pitoyables excuses pour votre détestable psyché de totalitaire et votre compulsion à forcer et réduire vos semblables en esclavage au nom d'un quelconque "intérêt général".
    Comprenez donc que ceci n'est pas un forum publique : c'est mon avant-poste dans la guerre culturelle que vous lancez contre moi, mes semblables, mes droits et ma liberté — vous ne serez que toléré ici, et seulement si je le décide. Je tire les ficelles, et ne vous doit rien. En fait je n'aime pas vous voir dans le coin, et en conséquence les seuls arguments de ma part auxquels vous puissiez réellement prétendre, si vous insistez, se transmettent par le canon de ma carabine de fort calibre Sig-Sauer(4) — Parce dès qu'ils s'agit d'ordures intolérantes, je suis un salaud d'intolérant.
    Alors gardez vos distances, et personne ne sera blessé.
  5. J'ai aussi un patience très limitée pour les sociaux-démocrates de toute confession et couleur, les centristes-du-centre fruits de l'union d'une méduse et d'un cul de singe, les Libertarés de l'École Rothbard conditionnés au "C'est la faute à l'Amérique, toujours et partout", Les Idiots d'Hollywood et les Crétins-de-Cannes, de même que ces parisiens qui se prennent pour une élite alors qu'ils ne sont que les bouseux du monde développé (5). J'ai cependant tendance à les ignorer, et ils peuvent donc s'estimer chanceux s'ils arrivent à me soutirer ne serait-ce qu'un sarcasme en langage fleuri.
  6. Ouais, et ne me lancez pas sur les journalistes et le Monde Merveilleux des Medias...
  7. Les soldats Américains et Britanniques (parmi lesquels j'inclue le Commonwealth) prennent place sur un piédestal particulier dans mon panthéon personnel. Manquez leur de respect ici, et vous souhaiterez rapidement vous trouver plutôt à la Mecque en période Hajj, tout nu avec seulement une pancarte autour du coup sur laquelle on puisse lire "Mahomet était un pédophile".
  8. Je peux modérer, supprimer ou éditer quoi que ce soit, sans fournir d'excuses ni d'explications. Cela n'a rien à voir avec de la “censure”, pour une raison très simple : je ne suis pas un État, vous n'êtes pas un citoyen opprimé dudit État et demeurez donc libre de vous exprimer sur votre propre support et par vos propres moyens. Commenter n'est pas un droit, c'est un privilège que j'accorde ou refuse selon mon droit de propriétaire des lieux.
  9. Mon site n'est pas affreusement partial, il est impudemment orienté. Si vous êtes de mon côté, vous avez mon aval et êtes libre de disserter à l'envi. Sinon, faites avec ou allez crever dans le caniveau.
  10. Oh, et si vous êtes végétarien, sachez que je chasse, tue, cuisine(6) et bouffe toutes sortes d'animaux, et que j'apprécie le tout sans aucune retenue. Soyez heureux avec vos carottes Docteur.
  1. C'est déjà arrivé.
  2. C'est aussi valable pour le Livre d'Or.
  3. Ce qui inclue aussi ses variantes : Socialisme, National-Socialisme, Communisme, Fascisme, etc.
  4. Avec un gros 'Bang'
  5. Londres, New-York, Sydney ou Tokyo, d'accord. Mais Paris, c'est un bled de cul-terreux.
  6. Généralement avec une sauce au vin, ou alors des poignées d'épices à t'arracher la tripaille. Le raisin et les piments, ça compte comme trucs de végétarien, non ?

Help

  1. As an additional layer of defense against comment spamming and surf-by shooting, I enacted a set of restrictions on how you can post a comment as a simple guest on my site (i.e. either when you're not registered as a member, or registered but not logged in), starting with pre-publishing comment approval. As approving comments will take a certain — and variable — amount of time, I invite you to check-in if you're serious about joigning the conversation in real time.
  2. Non-authenticated users are also limited to the following HTML tags:
    • Bold (<strong></strong>)
    • Italic (<em></em>)
    • Underline (<u></u>)
    • Quote (<blockquote></blockquote>)
    Don't bother entering any other tags, as they will automagically get stripped on posting.
  3. Members have access to a greater range of tags and publishing tools, and they can also choose to be informed by email of follow-up comments, for any given thread.
  4. Members also have an easier and more straightforward posting process. Some of the system defenses are lowered for them, and the details fields (name, etc.) are pre-filled with the information they entered in their profile.
  5. Members have a greater chance to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, while it will be assumed that, in addition to an opinion, strangers have stinky feet and greasy fingers. They may therefore be regarded with great condescension by regular members and the dissident frogman alike, and derided accordingly. So wash your feet, your hands, and register.
  6. A reminder: you decide what you write, no matter how brilliant or stupid it might be, and the fact that I let it go published doesn't mean I condone, agree or disagree with it—no matter if I answer it or not. Hey, you're supposed to be a responsible adult, right?

If you need further help with the site, you may want to check the Field Manual. Ultimately, you can also drop me a line. I usually don't answer jellyfish and buttermonkey(1) hybrids however.

  1. Nope, don't know what species is that either, but it does sound like a particularly vile creature, doesn't it?
  1. En défense contre le spam et les tirs isolés, j'ai établi un ensemble de restrictions sur l'ajout de commentaires par les simples visiteurs sur le site (i.e. soit lorsque vous n'êtes pas enregistré comme membre, soit lorsque vous l'êtes, mais n'avez pas ouvert une session), dont notamment la modération avant publication. L’approbation des commentaires prenant un temps certain et variable, je vous invite donc à vous inscrire, si vous envisagez sérieusement de participer à la conversation en temps réel.
  2. Les utilisateurs non authentifiés sont également limités aux balises HTML suivantes :
    • Gras (<strong></strong>)
    • Italique (<em></em>)
    • Souligné (<u></u>)
    • Citation (<blockquote></blockquote>)
    Ne vous fatiguez pas à en utiliser d'autres, le texte passe par un filtre de suppression lors de la publication.
  3. Les membres ont accès à une plus large sélection d'outils et de balises, et ils peuvent choisir pour chaque 'conversation' à laquelle ils prennent part d'être informé par email des réponses.
  4. Les membres ont également un "processus de publication" plus simple et direct. Certaines défenses du système sont abaissées pour eux, et les champs des détails sont pré-remplis avec les informations qu'ils ont entré dans leur profil.
  5. Les membres ont une plus grande chance d'entrer au Royaume des Cieux, tandis que l'on considèrera que, en sus d'une opinion, les visiteurs venus d'ailleurs ont les doigts gras et les pieds sales. Ils pourront de ce fait être traité avec grande condescendance par les autres membres et le dissident frogman de même, et ridiculisés en conséquence. Alors lavez vos mains, vos pieds, et inscrivez-vous.
  6. Pour mémoire : vous décidez de ce que vous écrivez, aussi brillant ou stupide que cela soit, et le fait que j'en autorise la publication ne signifie pas que je l'approuve ou le désapprouve, et cela que j'y réponde ou non. Hé, vous êtes censé vous comporter en adulte responsable, s'pas ?

Si vous avez besoin de plus d'aide avec le site, jetez un œil au manuel d'instruction. Au pire, vous pouvez également m'envoyer un mot. J'ai cependant tendance à ne pas répondre aux fruits de l'union d'une méduse et d'un cul de singe.

Comments | Commentaires

infinity | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for infinity
United States
Website
10/09 2009
09:15 AM

He joins in the company of Arafat, Gore and Carter.. I’m sure this is what Alfred Nobel intended the Peace prize to become.. Not.. Based on his supposed accomplishments and they are already trying to give him the 2012 election.. why not wait till 2012 or 2016? Ohh yeah, based on the calendar that the Mayan’s problaby just got tired of extending out or got wiped out before they could finish, some think the world will end in 2012..

 

 

2hotel9 | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
10/09 2009
09:29 AM

So, that was the agonized scream I heard wafting from the East around 06:00 EST !!!!

 

So, one sentence in a speech that the world laughed at earns a Nobel now. What an abysmal joke. I bet Alfred would commit suicide if he was not already dead.

 

DaToad | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for DaToad
United States
In: Glendale, AZ, USA
10/09 2009
09:54 AM

That whirring sound you’re hearing is Alfred spinning in his grave. Too bad he can’t send a big batch of his inventions to the idiots in Oslo…

So who is next? Je$$e Jackson and Al $harpton? Hugo Chavez? Fidel? Amindeedajerk? Kim Jong Mentally Il? Maybe they can have a new posthumous recognition category and they can give awards to Idi Amin, Stalin and Mao.

 

Proof | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Proof
United States
Website
In: Stockton, Callifornia, USA
10/09 2009
11:18 AM

Did April 1st. come late this year?

 

floridasuzie | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for floridasuzie
United States
In: Florida
10/09 2009
11:29 AM

It would be funny if it wasn’t so ridiculous. Gore, Carter, Obama. The formerly "prestigious" Nobel Peace Prize is now just so much fluff for grandiose self-labelling liberals.

I had the strange experience this summer of being on Cape Cod during the Kennedy funeral. I didn’t go for it of course, I just happened to be there when it happened. Anyway, I saw the presidential helicopter (or at least I think it was - it had the presidential seal) and was so excited until I realized even if the president was on board it was only Obama. What a bummer. I like to think maybe at least it was the same heli Bush rode in, then I could feel respect.

 

Red Collar | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Red Collar
United States
Website
In: Montreal, Qc, Can
10/09 2009
04:40 PM

“So they must have some kind of a sense of humor, I suppose.”

Yes they do and I’ve been laughing and laughing and laughing.

Arafat, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and Obama.  There’s a nice bunch of people I wouldn’t want to be a part of.

Quel horreur!

 

infinity | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for infinity
United States
Website
10/09 2009
11:19 PM

Don’t Forget the "Honorable" Yassar Arafat…........

 

 

kinda seems like they have been pissing on the Winners such as Martin Luther King Jr and Nelson Mandela Lately…

Although what do you expect… Gorby got a Nobel Peace prize in 1990.. but none for Reagan…

 

mycroft69 | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for mycroft69
United States
In: Bristol, Vermont - United States
10/10 2009
02:49 PM

Frogman, I just can’t get over how you have such a firm grasp of the U.S. political scene. But then, you are conservative. You have more persistence than I do. I gave up on my grandfather’s parents’ home, Canada, well over a few years ago.

 

Keep it coming; I love it!

 

unknown jane | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for unknown jane
United States
10/11 2009
10:26 AM

Next up, our president present vies for the Budweiser Real Men of Genius award and America’s Next Top Model.

 

I heard he’s a shoe in for both.

 

Melissa In Texas | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Melissa In Texas
United States
10/12 2009
03:59 AM

I find it most distressing that our former allies are being, well… shat upon and our enemies are viewing the (p)resident as a wuss. For this he gets a peace prize? The man has done absolutely nothing noteworthy, other than pull the scales over the eyes of so many gullible (or stupid) people!

When I awoke to this news on Friday, I was visiting friends in California. I could not believe what I was hearing. This after spending the day at the Reagan Library in the Simi Valley was simply disgusting! Dear heavens I miss Ronnie. *sigh*

Obama’s attempt to socialize our nation is going to drive our nation to bloodshed.

He only qualifies for the Booby Prize in my eyes!

 

 

Instinct | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Instinct
United States
Website
In: San Francisco, CA
10/15 2009
06:04 PM

They gave it to him for two reasons; He hates America and he’s not George Bush. 

The fools that handed out this award did it because they think since Obama is essentially a wuss that his passiveness towards our enemies will SOMEHOW magically bring peace.  Truth is that passiveness towards an enemy will bring a kinfe to your throat, but these fools don’t realize that or they do know and think that it’s an acceptable outcome.

In any event, I’ve been thinking of balancing my checkbook so shouldn’t I get the Nobel prize for economics?

 

MaryIndiana | 4 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for MaryIndiana
United States
In: United States of America
10/19 2009
01:40 PM

I just spent a happy hour throwing tennis balls to my black Lab…does that qualify me as a Wimbledon Champ? (fingers crossed)

 

Ansar-III | 4 years, 5 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed Ansar-III
Canada
10/29 2009
08:14 AM

Easy guys! The Nobel has been awarded to more reasonable people, such as Menachem Begin.

"On the 10 of April 1948, the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin, near Jerusalem, was destroyed. Its inhabitants, 260 men, women and children, were slaughtered; some were shot, some hacked to death. The attack was a combined operation by two jewish groups, the Irgun, whose commander in chief was Menachem Begin, and the Stern Gang, one of whose leaders was Yitzhak Shamir. In 1980, Menachem Begin was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. In 1983, when Begin resigned from office, he was succeeded as Prime Minister of Israel by Yitzhak Shamir.’

Whew! It’s good to know at least some noble mass murderers are winning instead of men who have never gotten their hands dirty!

 

2hotel9 | 4 years, 5 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
10/29 2009
11:23 AM

Too bad that massacre was committed by Syrian nationals, but hey, you don’t really care, as long as you have pics of dead babies to masturbate over your happy.

 

Ansar-III | 4 years, 5 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed Ansar-III
Canada
10/29 2009
01:46 PM

Woah, did you even bother Googling ‘Deir Yassin massacre’ or did you decide to spew some random fact? A simple Google search would show you that all the groups involved were government-linked Jewish groups and it does nothing to disprove that Nobel prize winners were involved in the mass murder.  

 

2hotel9 | 4 years, 5 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
10/29 2009
02:52 PM

Irgun and STERNS attacked the village, fact. Syrian nationals who were part of Arab League forces murdered the people AFTER the attack. AL forces did this on a routine basis as part of driving "palestinians" away from any cooperation with the Jews or UN and as a means of taking possesion of land inside the Mandate. Get a clue, Magoo.

 

Ansar-III | 4 years, 5 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed Ansar-III
Canada
10/29 2009
04:04 PM

Are you…are you serious? Can you even take yourself seriously? 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_(group)

Can you find me where it says the Sterns are Syrians? And did you take into account that since it took place before the creation of Israel, none of the members in the unit could not be Israeli citizens due to there being no Jewish nation for them to be citizens of? As for the killings taking place after Jews left the area, can you confirm that? I doubt you can, with even a prominent, painfully pro-Israeli website making no mention of Syrians doing any killing.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/deir_yassin.html

One last thing where are you getting your facts?

 

2hotel9 | 4 years, 5 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
10/30 2009
05:57 AM

Do you even know what happened in that region? Or do you simply run to wiki for a quick agit-prop fix?

 

2hotel9 | 4 years, 5 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
10/30 2009
05:59 AM

And yes, Irgun and STERNS did attack that, and many other, village. And Syrian nationals who were part of the AL forces in the area killed the villagers AFTER the attack.

 

Ansar-III | 4 years, 5 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed Ansar-III
Canada
10/30 2009
10:44 AM

Okay. Prove it. Can you prove it? Can you give legitimate sources? Can you find proof? Can you back up that statement? So I used Wikipedia. Does that change the fact you can’t prove your statements? No, but nice try.  

 

2hotel9 | 4 years, 5 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
10/30 2009
11:33 AM

I don’t have to prove anything, the historical facts are there for all to see. Now, post some more revisionist history for us. It is comical as hell.

 

Ansar-III | 4 years, 5 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed Ansar-III
United States
11/04 2009
07:23 AM

http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=Deir+Yassin+Syrian+Nationals&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Nope, nothing. Google isn’t the be all and end all of historical research but damn! you’d think they’d have something there. Or is Google part of the socialist conspiracy as well? Now I realize how wrong I was trying to get you to prove your points. It’s time to start looking beyond all the things daddy told you were true. You’re a big boy now and big boys need to start formulating their own opinions since daddy’s ‘facts’ weren’t always true. 

 

2hotel9 | 4 years, 5 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
11/04 2009
07:56 AM

I don’t have to prove anything, the historical facts are there for all to see. No group has murder more Palestinians than Muslims members of the Arab League. But hey! Keep rewriting history, you may convince yourself.

 

Oh, and Irgun and STERNS committed lots of terrorist acts, the King David Hotel comes immediately to mind. You don’t care about that, cause they killed Brit and French nationals, and you approve of that.

 

Ansar-III | 4 years, 5 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed Ansar-III
United States
11/18 2009
07:05 AM

>Trimming waste of space. Please wait…

Trimming complete.

 

2hotel9 | 4 years, 5 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
11/18 2009
08:07 AM

Post some more revisionist history, leftard. we love laughing at that crap.

 

Comment page 1 / 1 pages |

Trackbacks

Post title: The Noble Puff Piece Prize Returns

Date: 09th October, 2009