Bad Juju! You no logged in or no introduced to the frogman. Log-in or register. Or suffer mucho hoo-doos.

The Bar

Have a drink and talk about:

We is teh angry.
the dissident frogman | Fri, August 31, 2007 | Permalink | 1821 hits

Post

You're not logged-in, so your comment will be held for approval; check the "Help" tab for details.

Vous n'avez pas ouvert de session, votre commentaire doit être approuvé avant publication; voyez "Aide" pour les détails.


Comment form

Red-framed fields required. Email address will NOT be published or shared but may be used for a direct answer, on my part only.

Les champs bordés de rouge sont requis. L'adresse email ne sera PAS publiée ou partagée mais pourra être utilisée pour une réponse directe, de ma part seulement.


Guidelines | consignes

DISCLAIMER: in my experience, the following doesn't apply to 99% of my readership. Unfortunately, experience also shows it has to be written down for the remaining 1%.

The short version, when it comes to my comments policy, goes down to a line taken from the (mediocre) second opus of the Matrix:

"I built this place. Down here, I make the rules."

Let's elaborate a bit:

  1. Try to stay on topic. If you have a beef against the cow-fart(1) induced climate change and this post is about monkey spanking(2), then it's not the place to draw your sword(3).
    I have nothing against a freewheeling conversation, but if it's off-topic AND stupid or offensive, then it will have a badly limited lifespan.
  2. Consider the two following statements…
    • I'm totally open-minded when it comes to rational ideas.
    • It is quite obvious that Anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, Islamism, Nationalism, Racism, Collectivism(4) and Multiculturalism (non-exhaustive list) exist in complete contradiction with Reason.
    … And guess the total amount of tolerance you can expect from me if you indulge in any of these.
  3. If you shall persist in these ways nevertheless, understand that I'm not spending countless hours of work on this site to "reach out", "debate" with you, "understand" your "root causes" or "learn" about your religion. Unlike race, ideology is something we choose, and for which we must bear all responsibilities. I loathe your sick mindset and what you defend and promote. I've heard all your pitiful excuses for your despicable totalitarian psyche and your compulsion to coerce or enslave your fellow men and women in the name of some "greater good".
    So understand that this is not a public forum: it is my outpost in the culture war you wage against me, my kin, my rights and my freedom — thus, you will only be tolerated here, and only if I decide so. I call the shots and I owe you nothing. As a matter of fact, I don't like having you around, so the only argument you're truly entitled to hear from me would come, if you insist, amplified through the barrel of my Sig-Sauer high powered rifle(5) — because when it comes to intolerant scumbags, I'm an intolerant bastard.
    So keep your distances, and nobody gets hurt.
  4. I also have a very limited patience for social-democrats of all race and creed, center-of-center jellyfish and buttermonkey(6) hybrids, Blame-America-First (and always) Libertarians (usually of the Rothbardian school), Hollywood idiots & Festival-de-Cannes cretins and those Parisians who fancy themselves as an elite when they are nothing but the developed world's rednecks(7). However, I tend to ignore them, so they may consider themselves lucky if they manage to draw some sarcasm in colorful language from me.
  5. Yeah, and don't get me started on journalists and the Wonderful World of Mainstream Media...
  6. American and British soldiers (including the Commonwealth) stand on a special pedestal in my personal pantheon. Disrespect them here, and you'll quickly wish you'd rather stand naked in Mecca during Hajj, wearing only a sign that reads "Muhammad was a pedophile".
  7. I may moderate, remove or edit anything and give neither excuses nor explanations. It has nothing to do with "censorship": I am not a State, you are not a coerced citizen of said State and so you are always free to express yourself on your own facility and by your own means. Commenting is not a right, it is a privilege I grant or take away, according to my right as the owner of this place.
  8. My site is not awfully biased: it's shamelessly opinioned. If you're on my side, you get my vote and are free to rant 'n' roll. If not, live with it or go rot in the gutter.
  9. Oh and, if you're a vegan, be advised that I hunt, kill, cook(8) and eat all sorts of animals, and thoroughly enjoy the whole lot of it. Have fun with your carrots, Doc.
  1. Ha ha. Beef. Cow. Geddit?
  2. It's been known to happen.
  3. Neither is the guestbook by the way.
  4. That includes of course all its variations: Socialism, National-Socialist, Communism, Fascism, etc.
  5. With a loud 'Bang'
  6. Nope, don't know what species is that either, but it does sound like a particularly vile creature, doesn't it?
  7. Tell me London, New-York, Sydney or Tokyo, but Paris is a dump.
  8. Frequently in some sort of wine sauce or with loads of tears-pulling spices. Grapes and pepper count as veggie stuff right?

AVERTISSEMENT : selon mon expérience, ce qui suit ne s'applique pas à 99% de mes lecteurs. Malheureusement, l'expérience prouve aussi qu'il faut que cela soit écrit pour le pourcentage restant.

La version courte, concernant ma politique pour les commentaires, se résume à une ligne tirée du second (médiocre) volet de Matrix:

"J'ai construit cet endroit. Ici, je fais les lois."

Élaborons un brin :

  1. Il existe une subtile différence entre "être familier" et "traiter familièrement". Cela signifie que les culs-sales qui s'imaginent débarquer ici et me tutoyer comme si nous avions gardé les piquets de grève ensemble verront leur contribution à la conversation éradiquée sans autre forme de procès. Quelle que soit la pertinence de ladite contribution. Même si vous n'êtes Vraiment Pas Content® avec ce que j'écris, cela ne vous dispense pas de surveiller vos manières : tant que je n'ai pas été présenté à votre chère Maman, nous nous vouvoierons. Vu ?
  2. Évitez le hors-sujet. Si vous avez une rancune à l'égard de l'impact des pets de vache sur le changement climatique et que cet article traite de la fessée de macaque(1), alors ce n'est pas l'endroit d'où lancer votre croisade (2).
    Je n'ai rien contre une conversation à bâtons rompus, mais si c'est hors-sujet ET stupide ou insultant, ça aura une durée de vie salement limitée.
  3. Considérez les deux affirmations suivantes...
    • J'ai une ouverture d'esprit totale en ce qui concerne toutes idées rationnelles.
    • Il est évident qu' Anti-américanisme, anti-Sémitisme, Islamisme, Nationalisme, Racisme, Collectivisme(3) et Multiculturalisme (liste non-exhaustive) existent en complète contradiction avec la Raison.
    ... Et tâchez de devinez la dose totale de tolérance que vous pouvez attendre de moi si vous cédez à l'une de ces sirènes.
  4. Si vous deviez cependant persister dans ces voies, comprenez que je ne dépense pas un nombre incalculable d'heures de travail sur ce site pour vous "tendre la main", "débattre" avec vous, "comprendre" vos "causes profondes" ou "apprendre à connaitre" votre religion. Contrairement à la race, l'idéologie est le résultat de nos choix, et nous devons en supporter l'entière responsabilité. J'abhorre votre mentalité tarée, et ce que vous défendez et promouvez. J'ai entendu toutes vos pitoyables excuses pour votre détestable psyché de totalitaire et votre compulsion à forcer et réduire vos semblables en esclavage au nom d'un quelconque "intérêt général".
    Comprenez donc que ceci n'est pas un forum publique : c'est mon avant-poste dans la guerre culturelle que vous lancez contre moi, mes semblables, mes droits et ma liberté — vous ne serez que toléré ici, et seulement si je le décide. Je tire les ficelles, et ne vous doit rien. En fait je n'aime pas vous voir dans le coin, et en conséquence les seuls arguments de ma part auxquels vous puissiez réellement prétendre, si vous insistez, se transmettent par le canon de ma carabine de fort calibre Sig-Sauer(4) — Parce dès qu'ils s'agit d'ordures intolérantes, je suis un salaud d'intolérant.
    Alors gardez vos distances, et personne ne sera blessé.
  5. J'ai aussi un patience très limitée pour les sociaux-démocrates de toute confession et couleur, les centristes-du-centre fruits de l'union d'une méduse et d'un cul de singe, les Libertarés de l'École Rothbard conditionnés au "C'est la faute à l'Amérique, toujours et partout", Les Idiots d'Hollywood et les Crétins-de-Cannes, de même que ces parisiens qui se prennent pour une élite alors qu'ils ne sont que les bouseux du monde développé (5). J'ai cependant tendance à les ignorer, et ils peuvent donc s'estimer chanceux s'ils arrivent à me soutirer ne serait-ce qu'un sarcasme en langage fleuri.
  6. Ouais, et ne me lancez pas sur les journalistes et le Monde Merveilleux des Medias...
  7. Les soldats Américains et Britanniques (parmi lesquels j'inclue le Commonwealth) prennent place sur un piédestal particulier dans mon panthéon personnel. Manquez leur de respect ici, et vous souhaiterez rapidement vous trouver plutôt à la Mecque en période Hajj, tout nu avec seulement une pancarte autour du coup sur laquelle on puisse lire "Mahomet était un pédophile".
  8. Je peux modérer, supprimer ou éditer quoi que ce soit, sans fournir d'excuses ni d'explications. Cela n'a rien à voir avec de la “censure”, pour une raison très simple : je ne suis pas un État, vous n'êtes pas un citoyen opprimé dudit État et demeurez donc libre de vous exprimer sur votre propre support et par vos propres moyens. Commenter n'est pas un droit, c'est un privilège que j'accorde ou refuse selon mon droit de propriétaire des lieux.
  9. Mon site n'est pas affreusement partial, il est impudemment orienté. Si vous êtes de mon côté, vous avez mon aval et êtes libre de disserter à l'envi. Sinon, faites avec ou allez crever dans le caniveau.
  10. Oh, et si vous êtes végétarien, sachez que je chasse, tue, cuisine(6) et bouffe toutes sortes d'animaux, et que j'apprécie le tout sans aucune retenue. Soyez heureux avec vos carottes Docteur.
  1. C'est déjà arrivé.
  2. C'est aussi valable pour le Livre d'Or.
  3. Ce qui inclue aussi ses variantes : Socialisme, National-Socialisme, Communisme, Fascisme, etc.
  4. Avec un gros 'Bang'
  5. Londres, New-York, Sydney ou Tokyo, d'accord. Mais Paris, c'est un bled de cul-terreux.
  6. Généralement avec une sauce au vin, ou alors des poignées d'épices à t'arracher la tripaille. Le raisin et les piments, ça compte comme trucs de végétarien, non ?

Help

  1. As an additional layer of defense against comment spamming and surf-by shooting, I enacted a set of restrictions on how you can post a comment as a simple guest on my site (i.e. either when you're not registered as a member, or registered but not logged in), starting with pre-publishing comment approval. As approving comments will take a certain — and variable — amount of time, I invite you to check-in if you're serious about joigning the conversation in real time.
  2. Non-authenticated users are also limited to the following HTML tags:
    • Bold (<strong></strong>)
    • Italic (<em></em>)
    • Underline (<u></u>)
    • Quote (<blockquote></blockquote>)
    Don't bother entering any other tags, as they will automagically get stripped on posting.
  3. Members have access to a greater range of tags and publishing tools, and they can also choose to be informed by email of follow-up comments, for any given thread.
  4. Members also have an easier and more straightforward posting process. Some of the system defenses are lowered for them, and the details fields (name, etc.) are pre-filled with the information they entered in their profile.
  5. Members have a greater chance to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, while it will be assumed that, in addition to an opinion, strangers have stinky feet and greasy fingers. They may therefore be regarded with great condescension by regular members and the dissident frogman alike, and derided accordingly. So wash your feet, your hands, and register.
  6. A reminder: you decide what you write, no matter how brilliant or stupid it might be, and the fact that I let it go published doesn't mean I condone, agree or disagree with it—no matter if I answer it or not. Hey, you're supposed to be a responsible adult, right?

If you need further help with the site, you may want to check the Field Manual. Ultimately, you can also drop me a line. I usually don't answer jellyfish and buttermonkey(1) hybrids however.

  1. Nope, don't know what species is that either, but it does sound like a particularly vile creature, doesn't it?
  1. En défense contre le spam et les tirs isolés, j'ai établi un ensemble de restrictions sur l'ajout de commentaires par les simples visiteurs sur le site (i.e. soit lorsque vous n'êtes pas enregistré comme membre, soit lorsque vous l'êtes, mais n'avez pas ouvert une session), dont notamment la modération avant publication. L’approbation des commentaires prenant un temps certain et variable, je vous invite donc à vous inscrire, si vous envisagez sérieusement de participer à la conversation en temps réel.
  2. Les utilisateurs non authentifiés sont également limités aux balises HTML suivantes :
    • Gras (<strong></strong>)
    • Italique (<em></em>)
    • Souligné (<u></u>)
    • Citation (<blockquote></blockquote>)
    Ne vous fatiguez pas à en utiliser d'autres, le texte passe par un filtre de suppression lors de la publication.
  3. Les membres ont accès à une plus large sélection d'outils et de balises, et ils peuvent choisir pour chaque 'conversation' à laquelle ils prennent part d'être informé par email des réponses.
  4. Les membres ont également un "processus de publication" plus simple et direct. Certaines défenses du système sont abaissées pour eux, et les champs des détails sont pré-remplis avec les informations qu'ils ont entré dans leur profil.
  5. Les membres ont une plus grande chance d'entrer au Royaume des Cieux, tandis que l'on considèrera que, en sus d'une opinion, les visiteurs venus d'ailleurs ont les doigts gras et les pieds sales. Ils pourront de ce fait être traité avec grande condescendance par les autres membres et le dissident frogman de même, et ridiculisés en conséquence. Alors lavez vos mains, vos pieds, et inscrivez-vous.
  6. Pour mémoire : vous décidez de ce que vous écrivez, aussi brillant ou stupide que cela soit, et le fait que j'en autorise la publication ne signifie pas que je l'approuve ou le désapprouve, et cela que j'y réponde ou non. Hé, vous êtes censé vous comporter en adulte responsable, s'pas ?

Si vous avez besoin de plus d'aide avec le site, jetez un œil au manuel d'instruction. Au pire, vous pouvez également m'envoyer un mot. J'ai cependant tendance à ne pas répondre aux fruits de l'union d'une méduse et d'un cul de singe.

Comments | Commentaires

TBinSTL | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for TBinSTL
United States
In: St Louis MO USA
08/31 2007
09:15 AM

After his "Young Americans" gets its due time in the sun, I’m hoping Pat Dollarddecides to take up the cause for us. I think he could find enough talent and backing with all his connections but it will be a huge personal risk. Since he’s already been blown up in an IED attack, Hollywood probably won’t scare him much.


Lady Cincinnatus | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Lady Cincinnatus
United States
Website
In: Ohio & Kentucky
08/31 2007
09:23 AM

Prescient and timely blog entry, Frogman.    Take a look at the article out of Venice today (it’s on Drudge) about the anti-US film "Redacted".  Sickening.  


the dissident frogman | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for the dissident frogman
Website
08/31 2007
09:52 AM
Comment 2450

KL: Thanks for the heads up.

Frankly, I’m beyond the point where I would even care. Hollywood is as anti-American as it is uninspired, and we just have to expect that kind of sickening (indeed!) and misleading production from them - and nothing else.

However, what’s true for Ridley Scott goes for de Palma as well: as an independent citizen and moviegoer, I blacklist the whole lot, pure and simple. Don’t go, don’t watch, you have the power.

Once, or if they eventually reach the same level as the French movie industry (utterly boring movies, that only appeal to those who make them - with public money, most of the time), we’ll see how they bleed.


BlueStarMom | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for BlueStarMom
United States
08/31 2007
10:59 AM

Well thought-out.  Well written.  Too true.

I printed this for friends who do not have computers and credited you.

Keep writing.  


Robicon | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Robicon
United States
In: East Coast
08/31 2007
11:01 AM

All I can say is WOW. I’m glad there is someone who can articulate their thoughts with such precision.  I have the same opinion of our vaunted Hollyweird.  95% of what comes out is pure drivel, the other 5% goes straight to DVD, usually at the rate of 1 DVD per movie store - sentenced to obscurity by our ‘tolerant’ protectors.


Valerie, Texas | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Valerie, Texas
United States
08/31 2007
12:15 PM

DF, brilliant and well said!

Please, if possible, don’t go away again.  Breaks, when need be, but PLEASE don’t turn the lights out ever again!

For yours is a very bright light indeed. 

 


tinga-tinga | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for tinga-tinga
United States
08/31 2007
05:19 PM

"I swaggers the DIssident Frogman ..."

Hells bells.  Whose gonna notice anything I’ll ever say when you can get a Southern Belle reception like that?(Well, you earned it! Felicitations!)

 


the dissident frogman | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for the dissident frogman
Website
08/31 2007
05:30 PM
Comment 2456

tinga-tinga:Say what? A Southern Belle reception? For me? Where, oh where?


2hotel9 | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
08/31 2007
05:51 PM

Good thing I only play Warcraft anymore.  Excellent piece! I have been voicing my disatisfaction with the entertainment industry for years, and, as you point out so poignantly, They don’t care. I have long been quite underwhelemed by They.

 

As for "Shooter", as soon as I saw that Mark Walhberg was to portray Bob Lee "Bob the Nailer" Swagger I knew that I would have an extra $7 to spend on beer, cause I damn well ain’t gonna waste it on that movie.

And please tell me you have read the novels of Stephen Hunter! They are so disjointedly inter-connected,  the man is an artist.


tinga-tinga | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for tinga-tinga
United States
08/31 2007
05:57 PM

Gonna try anyway.

Your comment about Black Hawk Down was excellent.  It was NOT a gritty affirmation of sacrifice and bravery - even despite the soul-stirring demand of the two sharp shooters to return so they can help the downed pilot. NO!  The book was much better.   The ending scene of the dazed, "What’s it all about" American soldier (that blank-looking actor whatshisname) with the special ops guy who’s prepping to go back out into danger instead of staying at the base (safe).  The Special Ops says something to the effect, "It’s just soldiers watching out for each other - that’s all it is." Ker-THUD!!!  NO it’s NOT.  Richard Grenier some years ago made a similar complaint about  that WWII revisting movie - Saving Private Ryan -  all about retreiving one man.  Grenier hated it, calling it typical Hollywood Left reducing war to the little personal angst, ignoring the totalitarian fascist gorilla in the global room.   It’s been a long time since anyone crafted a movie that didn’t wring its fussy hands over hardship and setting the self aside for the greater good.  As for being clear-eyed and unwussy - well, Mel Gibson did a pretty good job with Apocalypso.  Good and decent was confronted by evil and rotten - and the audience had no doubt as to whose side they wanted to be on.

A further condemnation of Hollywood is that they do not know how to recruit believable actors any more.  Black Hawk Down was loaded with Brits and Commonwealth actors to play Americans.   Think it has something to do with the Hollywood aristocracy - the second generation bland wannabes get the roles, thanks to their family connections - more talented newcomers have a harder time landing parts.


tinga-tinga | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for tinga-tinga
United States
08/31 2007
06:03 PM

He he.  You could use that as a banner, "In swaggers the Dissident Frogman..." 

 

 


the dissident frogman | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for the dissident frogman
Website
08/31 2007
06:28 PM
Comment 2460

Val: it ain’t over ‘til the fat lady sings… and ‘til the frogman stops paying his web hosting bills.

Lights are always on, even when I’m away.

2hotel9: Haven’t read the book, but I’m a bit weary after the movie. Are you sure it’s not the same kind of HalliBushton conspiracy theories?

tinga-tinga: would you believe that I actually hesitated between SPR and BHD when I had to take an example of deceptive war movies? (I just ignored the Thin Red Line, simply because it doesn’t even pretend to ‘support the troops’ or at least acknowledge the cruelty of militarist imperialist Japan - just an arty-farty first class pacifist tearjerker. Small wonder Sean Penn is one of the lead characters...)

Thanks for the bit of trivia on Richard Grenier vs SPR, as Grenier and you articulate my thoughts, precisely, on Spielberg’s antiwar masquerade.

I’m a bit more reserved on Gibson’s Apocalypto, though not on the point you’re making.

And don’t get me started on Hollywood’s weird casts, indeed.


2hotel9 | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
08/31 2007
07:41 PM

Not even, Froggy! And be forewarned, Point of Impact is just the start. Hunter’s novels are written as stand alone stories, and yet they are interconnected. At least those books concerning the Swaggers and the Pyes are. I believe he has written around 12 novels, and they are a slice of Americana you will enjoy.


tinga-tinga | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for tinga-tinga
United States
08/31 2007
09:45 PM

Yes!  Watch very few new movies (maybe one a year?) and zero TV.  Got tired of watching a highly recommended show only to sit silently at the end of it feeling "had,"  even  "cheated" of what could have been great stuff.

Some time, not today - too big a topic - and only if this interests you - what might be called "the collapse of the French colonial empire."  The situation in say, Cote d’Ivoire and the flight of the French expatriate/colonialists.  Have often wondered how those people who invested so much in businesses and their lives have fared back in France after years, lifetimes even, away and if their plight has ever been discussed openly in France.  Lots of conditions in sub-Saharan Africa evoke the era of the Fall of the Roman Empire - what happens when the security umbrella of the troops is retracted as the colonial power retreats.  It seemed too that the French economy is no longer able to provide the support to those bastions of French education and culture- the French Schools - so expat families were looking at PAYING for what had been free or cheap - with little means to do so.   .... Hmmm.  sorry BIG subject ...  just have thoughts, but not enough for an essay.  Bonne nuit!  Et toujours - bonne chance avec l’inscription chez LGF!

 

 


bonmotdot | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for bonmotdot
United States
Website
In: Stranger from out there
09/01 2007
10:23 AM

Hey, FrenchFroggy, another Southern Belle blowing air kisses across the pond.  And you’ll find women in the south like your kind… strong beliefs in all the good things and a cool accent to go with it.  Oooo-la-la!

My own acquaintanceship with French cinema ended in Catholic grade school when the nuns played The Red Balloon for us.  What a wonderful movie!  That red balloon breaking free and gathering all the follower balloons into the sky spoke to something deep within my little red state American soul.  (Freedom: Awesome.... captivity: not so good)

Are you saying French cinema isn’t that cool anymore? 

As for the drivel put out by Hollywood...  I think this one goes beyond boycotting the film.  We need to boycott all theaters while such films are on their marquees.  And let the offending theaters know why.  Such cinematic malice needs to become a fiscal plague to any theater that dares roll the film.   But until we get angry enough, they’ll just keep shovelling more of the same at us. 

By the way, does anyone know if Hollywood makes allowances for the ridiculous hike in movie ticket prices when they announce that their latest mental slopfest grossed $beaucoup millions on its first weekend?  Is that compared with the $4 tickets from a better movie that was released in the 1980s?   Of course a movie will gross twice as much now.   Or do they consider that when they pat themselves on the back?

 

 


tinga-tinga | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for tinga-tinga
United States
09/01 2007
05:32 PM

Take a look at the American Thinker this weekend : Death of A Phony. http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/09/death_of_a_phony_moralist.html   ABOUT TIME!  Most of the required reading for schools is horrible, pointless and anti-American tripe. Denigrating the solid middle class and its pursuits.  (Salt of the earth?)  French schools have the same problem - wasn’t it the British who determined that Maupassant was bad for young minds?   Our son was in 3eme and was groaning at the books the class was required to read.  Prepped him with Mark Twain (specifically Innocents Abroad) first, then let him loose against La Maitresse.  His  class was in delighted hysterics because with every new book she handed out, our son would raise his hand and ask, "So, do they commit suicide in this book?"  The kids couldn’t wait to finish the old roman, just to be able to watch her squirm, trying to dodge him.


Iwo Gina | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Iwo Gina
United States
In: Columbia, Maryland
09/02 2007
09:36 AM

The Goebbels School of Propaganda has not only survived, it is alive and well and living in Hollywood.


Ms.ManChow | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Ms.ManChow
United States
Website
In: Maryland
09/02 2007
03:16 PM

300 rocked, no question, besides all the lovely men with spears and capes, it was filled with fantastic dialog about the meaning of freedom, the cost and it’s great worth.  I didn’t bother with Black Hawk Down.  Saving Private Ryan was stupid as well.  No soldier, especially of that time, ever told someone to "earn it".  What a load of crap.  You served, fought and possibly died to defend freedom, not to protect one man.  We are by no means a collective, but freedom is a group effort. 


Faye_Valentine | 2 years, 6 months ago
Avatar for Faye_Valentine
United States
In: Minnesota, USA
09/02 2007
07:17 PM

I havent been to a movie theater in years.  *hugs cable box*

I thought 300 was boring honestly, the only thing that made it good was all the half naked men for a change instead of half naked/fully nude women.  But yeah, Hollywood is one big circlejerk, filled with idiots with heads far FAR up their asses.  We’ve known this for years.


Comment page 1 / 1 pages |

Trackbacks

Post title: We is teh angry.

Date: 31st August, 2007