<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>the dissident frogman (Full English)</title>
    <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/</link>
    <description>time to take sides | Full English RSS 2.0 feed</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>thedissidentfrogman@gmail.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009 the dissident frogman / Gorilla Guerilla Inc.</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-06-25T18:44:00-06:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    
<item>
      <title>Catfight, from D.C. to Alaska</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/catfight-from-dc-to-alaska/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/catfight-from-dc-to-alaska/#When:18:44:00Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A Beast takes potshots at the Beauty:<blockquote><strong><a href="http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/kerry_palin_missing/2009/06/25/229028.html">Sen. John Kerry Wishes Sarah Palin Had Gone Missing</a></strong><br />
<br />
Sen. John Kerry added to his long list of lame joke attempts yesterday when he wished South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford's disappearance on Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.<br />
<br />
Speaking to some business and civic leaders he had invited to Washington, Kerry quipped: "Too bad if a governor had to go missing it couldn&#8217;t have been the governor of Alaska. You know, Sarah Palin."</blockquote>Well no surprise here: if Vicious-President Al Gore invented the Internet, we know by now that Senescent <a href="http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/i_see_a_red_button_rising_on_ira_tous_au_bouton_rouge">John Kerry</a> redefined lameness. I mean, even putting partisanship aside, that joke is not funny.<br />
<br />
Kerry, if memory serves, is the genuine/fake antiwar-activist/hero&reg; who, in a major election, got his ass <a href="http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/about_this_very_red_button_a_propos_de_ce_bouton_trs_rouge">whipped clean by the allegedly ultra-stupid "W"</a>&mdash; ultra-stupid that is, according to the very Kerry and his boyz on the Left. When you think of it even superficially, that should be enough to make any Kerry want to crawl under a rock and never, ever goes on public record again. I mean, if millions of voters will still pick the village idiot over you, you'd better off leaving any pretense to public office and, I don't know, go get yourself a Nobel Prize on account of alerting The World that snow and ice are melting down in Summer.<br />
<br />
Now, and still thinking superficially, I can see two reasons why Kerry would wish Sarah Palin had gone missing:<br />
<br />
First, he knows there's an awful lot of people who appreciate her and her politics&mdash;possibly as many as those who loathe him and his party of crooks and liars. They're usually the same folks, actually, and thank to the Obaminable Administration's relentless efforts to turn America into a nation of subjects and beggars, their numbers are growing by the day.<br />
<br />
Oh and, they can vote.<br />
<br />
The second reason is already obvious to every man in the audience, including me and you&mdash;if you happen to be a dude. So obvious that it's a bit embarrassing to mention.<br />
<br />
However, since it is embarrassing for him, and not for you and me, here it goes: unlike Kerry, Sarah Palin is a <em>real</em> woman.<br />
<br />
And a very attractive one with that. Not some insufferably precious, half-assed ageing wussie with a ridiculously outdated hairdo. She'll beat him any day, hands down, on the brains <em>and</em> the looks.<sup><small>1</small></sup>   <p>---<small><ol><li>Assuming Kerry was to put a fight of course&mdash;considering his Vietnam record, a fair amount of doubt is legitimate here.</li></ol></small></p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>USA, Mentals&#45;and&#45;other&#45;Lefties</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-25T18:44:00-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>Examples to ponder while Obama crafts his socialized healthcare plans</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/examples-to-ponder-while-obama-crafts-his-socialized-healthcare-plans/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/examples-to-ponder-while-obama-crafts-his-socialized-healthcare-plans/#When:18:44:00Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Disclaimer: I have an acquaintance within the French national health care insurance system. This is my source. What you're about to read is true.</em></p><p>Socialized health care is just one step on the <a href="http://hayekcenter.org/?p=273">Road to Serfdom</a>&mdash;though a dramatic one. And a deep dive down the Bureaucratic Twilight Zone of the Absurd. Take France for instance:
</p>
<p>
The much vaunted<small><sup>1</sup></small> French &#8220;free&#8221;<small><sup>2</sup></small>, mandatory, state-run health care insurance may reimburse any patient&#8217;s <em>second</em> hearing aid if, and <em>only if he is <strong>blind</strong></em>.
</p>
<p>
Get that? Sociali<del>st</del>zed health care means that you will be allowed to hear only if you can&#8217;t see<small><sup>3</sup></small>. I mean, hey, you can&#8217;t have it all&mdash;there are other people waiting, you know. Selfish bastard.
</p>
<p>
And of course, the poor deaf and blind soul may get that if he first obtained the bureaucrats&#8217; authorization to get said second hearing aid. We can&#8217;t have any sort of self-medication going on, can we?
</p>   <p>---<small><ol><li>By the French state and it's lackeys. Oh, and by the myriads of civil servants who get paid off of it.</li><li>It's not free, of course&mdash;quite the contrary actually, as soon as you realize that you, your family, friends, employers and every single working citizen pay for it every month, all their lives and for a ridiculously small return, unless you happen to be deaf and blind, or terminally ill. (the amount you'll get for dental or ophthalmologic care is so low that it's insulting&mdash;I personally won't even bother returning the required forms to get reimbursed)</li><li>Provided you happen to have two ears, and be afflicted by deafness congenital or acquired. One should note that in this particular context, one-eyedness doesn't seem to make a difference in the State's health care arithmetic. Whatever the affected side.</li></ol></small></p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>EU and other debilitating diseases, France</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-23T18:44:00-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>Distributed Revolution</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/distributed-revolution/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/distributed-revolution/#When:17:53:00Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Begin <a href="http://www.catb.org/esr/nedanet/">NedaNet</a>, the Mullah Bypass:<blockquote>[...] a network of hackers formed to support the democratic revolution in Iran. Our mission is to help the Iranian people by setting up networks of proxy severs, anonymizers, and any other appropriate technologies that can enable them to communicate and organize &#8212; a network beyond the censorship or control of the Iranian regime.<br />
<br />
NedaNet doesn't have leaders or a manifesto or even much in the way of organization. We're not affiliated with any nation or religion. We're just computer hackers and computer users from all over the planet doing what we can to help the Iranian people in their struggle for freedom.<br />
<br />
[...]<br />
<br />
Think of me as a cut-out. I have very carefully not asked who our contacts in Iran are. I don't even know who most of the rest of the NedaNet people are, and don't intend to try to find out; they're basically just handles on an IRC channel from whom I get URLs and files. <strong>And for any jihadi interested in asking me questions face to face, I've got some bullets slathered in pork fat to make you feel extra special welcome.</strong></blockquote><br />
Realize that, should you wish to join the effort, there are real risks involved. However 1. those Iranians marching against the mad Mullahs need all the help and support they can get, as the outcome of their struggle and its implications worldwide go beyond a simple quarrel over fraudulent national elections, and 2. I believe Obama far from "being shy" is using this as an opportunity to weaken America even more &mdash; <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-2547-Watchdog-Politics-Examiner~y2009m6d22-Obama-contrasted-with-Reagan-courage-at-Berlin-Wall">by being the anti-Reagan</a>, on purpose. Call that his Joker Syndrome if you will, as summarized by Michael Caine in Nolan's <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468569/">The Dark Knight</a>:<blockquote>"Some men aren&#8217;t looking for anything logical, like money. They can&#8217;t be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn."</blockquote>While having <a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/06/obama-tells-killer-iranian-regime-world.html">some ice cream</a>, perhaps.<br />
<br />
So if nothing else, initiatives such as <a href="http://www.catb.org/esr/nedanet/">NedaNet</a> show that in the information age individuals all around the world can bypass both Iranian State terrorists and the most defective US President ever.<br />
<br />
And that's definitely worth it.   ]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Iran&apos;s Mad Mullahs, Citizen, not subject, USA</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-23T17:53:00-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>Political philosophy clearance required</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/political-philosophy-clearance-required/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/political-philosophy-clearance-required/#When:05:42:01Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Is there someone, somewhere out there, who can come up with a valid explanation as to how a putrid sack of filth quoted as writing "<a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35192">WESTERN SOCIALISM, represents the future of the West</a>" could possibly be called by some <em>"a creature of the Right"?</em><br />
<br />
Apart from the fact that, amazingly enough, there still are some people unaware that Nazism ("classical" or neo) is a Leftist ideology by all accounts and measures, I'm at loss for an explanation.<br />
<br />
And then, ignorance is no excuse anyway.   ]]></description>
      <dc:subject>USA, Mentals&#45;and&#45;other&#45;Lefties</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-15T05:42:01-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>Expect powerful sound. A real blast.</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/expect-powerful-sound-a-real-blast/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/expect-powerful-sound-a-real-blast/#When:17:17:01Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Okay, the only things vaguely related to that elitist computer company Apple and its overpriced/underpowered products in which you will find me interested are IPODs.<br />
<br />
These <a href="https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=5c1f74fc854916819ce1d06a9a33d758&tab=core&_cview=0&cck=1&au=&ck=">IPODS</a>, to be precise<sup><small>1</small></sup>.<br />
<br />
I'd love to hear how they sound, say on a North Korean and Iranian Tour.   <p>---<small><ol><li>Hey, I did write <em>vaguely related</em>.</li></ol></small></p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Peace tools</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-12T17:17:01-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>Speak Americanish in 10 minutes</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/speak-americanish-in-10-minutes/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/speak-americanish-in-10-minutes/#When:15:34:00Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>June 6th, 2009:</strong> the current Resident of the United Sates, (Barack) Hussein (Obama) is in France playing tit for tat with the current Monkey (in a) Suit Monarch of France, Nicolas &quot;Windbag&quot; Sarkozy, and possibly commemorating D-Day at some point, at least as time and Michelle&#39;s Paris shopping list permit.</p>
<p>Oh, and the big topic of discussion for this official ROTUS<sup><small>1</small></sup> visit is apparently &quot;<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6434141.ece">Who Managed To Insult The Queen of England This Time?</a> (&#39;T&#39;was you wot done it&#39;)&quot;.</p>
<p>In other news, perhaps more related to the bloody yet glorious events of the 6th of June 1944 and the days after that, the French government has decided against all evidences to award the <em>L&#233;gion d&#39;Honneur </em>(Legion of Honor, one of the highest distinctions in the French arsenal) to a <em>phony</em> D-Day Hero.</p>
<p>Now, when it comes to the landing in Normandy, it&#39;s not as if there was a shortage of genuine heroes, both dead and alive (the <em>L&#233;gion d&#39;Honneur </em>can, of course, be awarded posthumously) so I rather suspect the French had to go out of their way to really find<em> that one fake paratrooper</em>.</p>
<p>Apparently, his biggest feat is that he chose to retire in France<sup><small>2</small></sup>. <a href="http://www.julescrittenden.com/2009/06/06/gallic-shrug/">Jules Crittenden has all the dirty details</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
Lowell, Mass., native/Derry, N.H., cop Howard Manoian&nbsp;retired to&nbsp;Ste. Mere-Eglise in 1985, where&nbsp;he is&nbsp;revered by the locals and has long earned free drinks, regaling tourists and reporters&nbsp;with tales of jumping into bitter combat with the 82nd Airborne...<br /><br />The sad part is, he actually deserves honors &#8230; for coming ashore at Utah Beach on D-Day in the 33rd Chemical Decon Co., serving in a supply dump, and being injured and wounded several times in the service of his nation &#8230; just not with any glamorous leaps into darkness or desperate house-clearing ops.</blockquote>
<p>Go read that, and on second thought, scratch &quot;<em>perhaps more related to the bloody yet glorious events of the 6th of June 1944</em>&quot; but ultimately don&#39;t be too upset with that latest Gallic infamy: the French bestow that legion of honor to just about any schmuck, from soccer players to third rate pop/rock singers. It&#39;s not as if it was worth anything anyway.</p>
<p>This 65th anniversary of D-Day is sadly shaping into a pathetic masquerade organized by a debased bunch of politicians who, be they Brown, Sarkozy or Wossname Obama, couldn&#39;t muster enough genuine respect, admiration and gratitude for the multitude that landed under fire on the beaches of Normandy&mdash;let alone the same fortitude and courage&mdash;even if their lives depended on it.</p>
<p>So rather than going on with the tribulations of these twats, I propose a couple of documents from my personal collection, published at a time when the French still had at least a bit of consideration for their liberators&mdash;and for some, even genuine gratitude&mdash;as the events were still fresh enough in their minds:</p>
<p>The 3rd part of a series of cheap &quot;souvenir&quot; leaflets, published in 1947, collecting Allied photos of D-Day:</p>
<p><a href="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-cover.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-cover.jpg','popup','width=815,height=615,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-cover_thumb.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Cover (click all these pictures for the larger version)</p>
<p><a href="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-6647.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-6647.jpg','popup','width=815,height=615,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-6647_thumb.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>The 1946 commemoration of the landing in Normandy. The text reads: &quot;On June 6th, 1946, it&#39;s in Courseulles this time that takes place the main commemoration of what the Anglo-Americans call &quot;The Invasion&quot;. (To the right, some of the ships of Courseulles&#39; artificial harbor).&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-1stpage.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-1stpage.jpg','popup','width=815,height=615,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/souvdeb-1stpage_thumb.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Odly enough, the leaflet opens with this picture, accompanied with the following, err, <em>specific</em> comment: &quot;In the harbor of Arromanches mostly deserted by now a Florida nigger song is heard: these great grandsons of slaves, came as well to liberate us...&quot;</p>
<p>That&#39;s a literal translation: the author writing in a France that what was still the center of a colonial empire, did use the French word for &quot;nigger&quot;, and not &quot;negro&quot; (that does exist in French too). Here&#39;s the catch: in French, the disrespectful epithet is n<em>&#233;gro</em> (negro), and not <em>n&#232;gre</em> (nigger).</p>
<p>Still, in contemporary France, this man would be lead at a <em>Gendarme</em>&#39;s gunpoint straight to the closest Sensitivity Training Station.</p>
<p>Next, on a lighter<sup><small>3</small></sup> note and maybe for the benefit of those modern illiterate Frenchies who deplore the time when mine was a bilingual blog where they could fault the &quot;Anglo-Americans&quot; for not speaking anything else than English<sup><small>4</small></sup>, a 1944 &quot;practical language&quot; manual: <em>Parlez l&#39;Am&#233;ricain en 10 minutes</em> (&quot;Speak American in 10 minutes&quot;), yours for the ridiculous price of 10 (1944) Francs.</p>
<p><a href="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/speak-american-10mn.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/speak-american-10mn.jpg','popup','width=615,height=715,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/speak-american-10mn_thumb.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="466" /></a></p>
<p>This is amusing on several levels. First the editor cared to provide his readers with a sort of phony phonetic version of each English word and sentence. It&#39;s the <em>avec prononciation indiqu&#233;e</em> mention on the cover, which means roughly, and quite ambitiously, &quot;including pronunciation&quot;. Sort of a &quot;So it is written, so it shall be spoken&quot; technique. Goes like this:</p>
<blockquote><strong>aujourd&#39;hui = today (toud&#233;)</strong></blockquote>
<p>The idea is that the French learner in this 10 minutes American crash course would pronounce the &quot;word&quot; between parenthesis, and would instantly sound <em>exactly</em> like Steve Martin as Inspector Clouseau in the Pink Panther.</p>
<p>And I do mean exactly.</p>
<p>The other funny thing is that this condensed 10-Minutes-American manual, though short as it is, is crippled with various grammar and vocabulary errors. Take the casual conversation section for instance:</p>
<blockquote><strong>Merci beaucoup = Thank you very well (Z&#232;nnk you v&#232;ri ou&#232;ll)</strong></blockquote>
<p><em>Merci beaucoup</em> translates usually as <em>Thank you very much</em>. At least that&#39;s what I was taught. Considering that my first teacher of basic English was a gorgeous, classy Tippi Hedren look-alike whom I still remember fondly nearly 30 years later, trust me: I <em>was</em> paying attention. </p>
<blockquote><strong>Parlez lentement, s.v.p. = Speak slouly, please (Sp&#238;k slauli pl&#238;ze)</strong></blockquote>
<p><em>Parlez lentement</em> translates of course as <em>Speak slowly</em>. I don&#39;t know what <em>slouly</em> means.</p>
<blockquote><strong>Etes-vous Am&#233;ricain ? = Are you Americanish ? (Are you Am&#233;rik&#233;nich)</strong></blockquote>
<p>Hey, don&#39;t ask me. I suppose the scholar behind that entry figured that if the English could also be called the British, then surely the same rule would apply to <em>Les Am&#233;ricans</em>.</p>
<p>Lastly, this beautiful confusion-starter:</p>
<blockquote><strong>Voulez-vous une cigarette ? = Have you a cigarette? (H&#232;ve you e sa&#239;gar&#232;tt)</strong></blockquote>
<p>Ouch.<em> Voulez-vous une cigarette</em> translates in fact as <em>Would you like a cigarette.</em> Imagine the number of G.I.s confronted with these legions of unaware Gallic beggars, and ask yourself: is that enough to explain Europe&#39;s reputation as parasites and freeloaders with respect to Uncle Sam&#39;s largesse from WWII on?</p>
<p>Yeah, maybe not. But things like that surely didn&#39;t help.</p>   <p>---<small><ol>
<li>Resident Of The United States. I&#39;d really appreciate if you could at least <em>pretend</em> that you&#39;re trying to follow, than you.</li>
<li>Admittedly quite an exploit, indeed. </li>
<li>I know what you&#39;re thinking, but no: no pun intended. Please head towards the closest Sensitivity Training Station.</li>
<li>By which they meant of course &quot;not French&quot; as they don&#39;t care about speaking anything else themselves.</li>
</ol></small></p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>USA, France, UK</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-06T15:34:00-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>Quote of the day: Breitbart</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/quote-of-the-day-breitbart/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/quote-of-the-day-breitbart/#When:09:32:00Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Okay, it's a quickie, but I'm still juggling with business endeavors, and therefore only tentatively (re)blogging for the time being. In short, this is just to show you I'm not dead).<br />
<br />
The following quote actually sums up quite well my reasons to keep that blog going as much as I possibly can, the various hiatuses notwithstanding:<blockquote>"Until the Right realizes that we&#8217;re in a propaganda war and we&#8217;re losing, we&#8217;ll be on the losing end of this debate." <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/NedRice/2009/06/01/can_andrew_breitbart_save_hollywood">Andrew Breitbart</a></blockquote>Nailed. Just two brief remarks:<br />
<br />
First, it explains how and why a meager majority of Americans elected a vile Euro-Marxist like Obama &mdash; and why I fear it may <em>happen again</em>,<br />
Next, it should be hammered down the thick heads of those <em>appeasers</em> on the Right (do I really need to name names?) who call for the Obamadministration to be given the benefit of the doubt, when they're not actually switching sides.<br />
<br />
Because as far as the vast Leftist nebulae (from Berkeley hippies to French '<em>Nouveaux anti-Capitalists</em>' to Persian Islamic Revolutionaries) is concerned, this is a fight to the death without rules or referee.   ]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Culture Warriors</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-02T09:32:00-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>Let her fly or bring her home</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/let-her-fly/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/let-her-fly/#When:14:50:00Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>The French State stifles and old American lady and a WWII veteran, and puts her down.</em></p>I'll be quite tied up for most of the coming 5 to 7 days, so here's a few pictures of flying beauties I've shot in 2007 and 2008 at the air show in Cerny (La Fert&#233;) near Paris.<br />
<br />
Glance at the piccies, and consider this an open thread, if you feel like hanging around.<br />
<br />
A cute German chick doing crazy things on the wings:<br />
<img src="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/wing-walker.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="510" /><br />
<br />
The unmissable Vaught F4U Corsair:<br />
<img src="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/corsair.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="510" /><br />
<br />
The B-17 Pink Lady, "the only flying survivor to see action in Europe during World War II":<br />
<img src="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/pink-lady-b17.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="510" /><br />
<br />
There's been dark clouds on the horizon for the Pink Lady for severals years now. Alas, <a href="http://www.thepinklady.fr/post/2008/03/27/Status-of-the-Pink-Lady">if this post is any indication</a>, she finally met her end, not at the hand of German anti-air defenses, not under the blows of time and neglect, but in the mortal coil of French red tape (emphasis mine):<blockquote>[...] the Pink Lady has found a sponsor to cover flight insurance costs for 2008, and so she will continue to fly this year. Next year is uncertain however. <strong>The problem is that (as I covered in an earlier post) the insurance costs in France for this aircraft have been multiplied by 8 in recent years, thus bringing her into the same category as the other, more modern Boeing, the 767 passenger jet...Indeed, it costs 7,000 euros per meeting.</strong><br />
<br />
[...]<br />
<br />
Concerning the state of the aircraft, she is in absolute prime flying condition. Indeed, she even underwent a major overhaul a few years ago, and has never missed a meeting due to any mechanical problems.<br />
<br />
Something bewildering to us Americans, is that she cannot be capitalized in order to cover insurance costs. <strong>In France, article 1 concerning historical aircraft states that the aircraft can only have on board people that perform a specific on-flight function. Consequently, it is impossible to pay for her flight costs by giving tours during air shows, something commonly done in the US for b-17s.</strong> As she receives no help from the French government, all her insurance costs must be paid for by sponsors.<br />
<br />
Therefore, given that mechanically she is in pristine condition and that there is no shortage of qualified pilots, <strong>it is clear that it is only the French government (whether by inappropriate insurance costs, absence of funding, and idiotic laws) that is doing everything possible to assure she is grounded</strong>, for she will fly as long as the ATV can cover insurance costs.</blockquote>No surprise here, this is typical French government "works". Don't get me started on the sorry state of this miserable country <em>please-thank-you-very-much-okay?</em><br />
<br />
If the <a href="http://www.thepinklady.fr/post/2008/03/27/Status-of-the-Pink-Lady#c8328758">last reader comment</a> is to be believed, the Pink Lady last took off in Auxerre, on September 28, 2008 around 6:00 PM.<br />
<br />
I was lucky to see her fly three years in a row, and it is a wonderful sight. Not anymore.<br />
<br />
Here's an idea: perhaps <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1567948/Sarkozy-demands-140-per-cent-increase-in-pay.html">one of the few guys who asked and actually got a bigger paycheck in today's France</a> could be interested in sponsoring the Pink Lady?<br />
<br />
<h4>UPDATE</h4><br />
Information is hard to find, but maybe the Pink Lady is not permanently grounded: a look at the <a href="http://www.ajbs.fr/programme-2009.php">Cerny Air Show list of planes for 2009</a> shows a "Boeing B-17G" without further identification - I suppose there's not too many of these still flying so perhaps they've found enough sponsors to keep her in the air another year. That's good news. Try to see her while it last.   ]]></description>
      <dc:subject>France, The&#45;Me, Ye Gods</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-04-22T14:50:00-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>About those Right&#45;Wing extremists&#8230;</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/about-those-right-wing-extremists/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/about-those-right-wing-extremists/#When:13:39:00Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;(...) throw down your Arms ye Villains, ye Rebels!&#8221;</em></p><p><img src="http://base.thedissidentfrogman.com/images/Patrick_Henry_Rothermel.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="750" /><br />
<small>Image: Patrick Henry's "Treason" speech before the House of Burgesses by Peter F. Rothermel, 1851.</small></p>Jules Crittenden with a riveting, monster of a post on Patriots Day: <a href="http://www.julescrittenden.com/2009/04/20/it-was-about-hope-and-change/">It Was About Hope, And Change...</a><blockquote>"To give a particular account of the ravages of the troops as they retreated from Concord to Charlestown, would be very difficult, if not impracticable. Let it suffice to say that a great number of the houses on the road were plundered and rendered unfit for use; several were burnt; women in childbed were driven by the soldiery naked into the streets; old men, peaceably in their houses were shot dead; and such scenes exhibited as would disgrace the annals of the most uncivilized nation.<br />
<br />
These, brethren, are marks of ministerial vengeance against this colony for refusing, with her sister colonies, submission to slavery, but they have not yet detached us from our royal sovereign. We profess to be his loyal and dutiful subjects, and so hardly dealt with as we have been, are still ready with our lives and fortunes to defend his person, family, crown, and dignity. Nevertheless, to the persecution and tyranny of his cruel ministry, we will not tamely submit. Appealing to Heaven for the justice of our cause, we determine to die or be free."</blockquote>That's the Massachusetts Provincial Congress trying to set the record straight with their "Friends and Fellow-Subjects" in Britain.<br />
<br />
Go read it all, and let it be a lesson for our modern times.<br />
<br />
<small>UPDATE: added the picture. Hey Reuters! Two can play this game!</small>   ]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Citizen, not subject, USA</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-04-20T13:39:00-06:00</dc:date>
    </item><item>
      <title>Voodoo Child</title>
      <link>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/voodoo-child/</link>
      <guid>http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog/link/voodoo-child/#When:21:49:00Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This one is coming right up my list of the most absurd headlines ever. From the BBC:<blockquote>Obama to regulate 'pollutant' CO2</blockquote>So CO2 is now <em>officially</em> a pollutant? And the Obama is going to "regulate" it? &mdash; which, in real English always mean <em>tax</em> it, incidentally.<br />
<br />
So what's next? Oxygen to be declared a toxin just to make sure the whole cycle is covered? Followed by a mandatory respiration license, and perhaps breathing quotas?<br />
<br />
Thanks to Obama, the cause of climate anti-science just made a great leap forward, pushing us back steadily to the Middle Ages. This new US Administration is following in the footsteps of Europe, using plain old fashioned superstition under the influence of witch-doctors as a cover for more confiscation and taxation.<br />
<br />
And these frauds dare call themselves <em>progressives</em>.   ]]></description>
      <dc:subject>USA, Global&#45;Waning</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-04-19T21:49:00-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    </channel>
</rss>