Bad Juju! You no logged in or no introduced to the frogman. Log-in or register. Or suffer mucho hoo-doos.

The Bar

Have a drink and talk about:

Plat du Jour
the dissident frogman | Mon, April 14, 2008 | Permalink | 463 hits

Post

You're not logged-in, so your comment will be held for approval; check the "Help" tab for details.

Vous n'avez pas ouvert de session, votre commentaire doit être approuvé avant publication; voyez "Aide" pour les détails.


Comment form

Red-framed fields required. Email address will NOT be published or shared but may be used for a direct answer, on my part only.

Les champs bordés de rouge sont requis. L'adresse email ne sera PAS publiée ou partagée mais pourra être utilisée pour une réponse directe, de ma part seulement.


Guidelines | consignes

DISCLAIMER: in my experience, the following doesn't apply to 99% of my readership. Unfortunately, experience also shows it has to be written down for the remaining 1%.

The short version, when it comes to my comments policy, goes down to a line taken from the (mediocre) second opus of the Matrix:

"I built this place. Down here, I make the rules."

Let's elaborate a bit:

  1. Try to stay on topic. If you have a beef against the cow-fart(1) induced climate change and this post is about monkey spanking(2), then it's not the place to draw your sword(3).
    I have nothing against a freewheeling conversation, but if it's off-topic AND stupid or offensive, then it will have a badly limited lifespan.
  2. Consider the two following statements…
    • I'm totally open-minded when it comes to rational ideas.
    • It is quite obvious that Anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, Islamism, Nationalism, Racism, Collectivism(4) and Multiculturalism (non-exhaustive list) exist in complete contradiction with Reason.
    … And guess the total amount of tolerance you can expect from me if you indulge in any of these.
  3. If you shall persist in these ways nevertheless, understand that I'm not spending countless hours of work on this site to "reach out", "debate" with you, "understand" your "root causes" or "learn" about your religion. Unlike race, ideology is something we choose, and for which we must bear all responsibilities. I loathe your sick mindset and what you defend and promote. I've heard all your pitiful excuses for your despicable totalitarian psyche and your compulsion to coerce or enslave your fellow men and women in the name of some "greater good".
    So understand that this is not a public forum: it is my outpost in the culture war you wage against me, my kin, my rights and my freedom — thus, you will only be tolerated here, and only if I decide so. I call the shots and I owe you nothing. As a matter of fact, I don't like having you around, so the only argument you're truly entitled to hear from me would come, if you insist, amplified through the barrel of my Sig-Sauer high powered rifle(5) — because when it comes to intolerant scumbags, I'm an intolerant bastard.
    So keep your distances, and nobody gets hurt.
  4. I also have a very limited patience for social-democrats of all race and creed, center-of-center jellyfish and buttermonkey(6) hybrids, Blame-America-First (and always) Libertarians (usually of the Rothbardian school), Hollywood idiots & Festival-de-Cannes cretins and those Parisians who fancy themselves as an elite when they are nothing but the developed world's rednecks(7). However, I tend to ignore them, so they may consider themselves lucky if they manage to draw some sarcasm in colorful language from me.
  5. Yeah, and don't get me started on journalists and the Wonderful World of Mainstream Media...
  6. American and British soldiers (including the Commonwealth) stand on a special pedestal in my personal pantheon. Disrespect them here, and you'll quickly wish you'd rather stand naked in Mecca during Hajj, wearing only a sign that reads "Muhammad was a pedophile".
  7. I may moderate, remove or edit anything and give neither excuses nor explanations. It has nothing to do with "censorship": I am not a State, you are not a coerced citizen of said State and so you are always free to express yourself on your own facility and by your own means. Commenting is not a right, it is a privilege I grant or take away, according to my right as the owner of this place.
  8. My site is not awfully biased: it's shamelessly opinioned. If you're on my side, you get my vote and are free to rant 'n' roll. If not, live with it or go rot in the gutter.
  9. Oh and, if you're a vegan, be advised that I hunt, kill, cook(8) and eat all sorts of animals, and thoroughly enjoy the whole lot of it. Have fun with your carrots, Doc.
  1. Ha ha. Beef. Cow. Geddit?
  2. It's been known to happen.
  3. Neither is the guestbook by the way.
  4. That includes of course all its variations: Socialism, National-Socialist, Communism, Fascism, etc.
  5. With a loud 'Bang'
  6. Nope, don't know what species is that either, but it does sound like a particularly vile creature, doesn't it?
  7. Tell me London, New-York, Sydney or Tokyo, but Paris is a dump.
  8. Frequently in some sort of wine sauce or with loads of tears-pulling spices. Grapes and pepper count as veggie stuff right?

AVERTISSEMENT : selon mon expérience, ce qui suit ne s'applique pas à 99% de mes lecteurs. Malheureusement, l'expérience prouve aussi qu'il faut que cela soit écrit pour le pourcentage restant.

La version courte, concernant ma politique pour les commentaires, se résume à une ligne tirée du second (médiocre) volet de Matrix:

"J'ai construit cet endroit. Ici, je fais les lois."

Élaborons un brin :

  1. Il existe une subtile différence entre "être familier" et "traiter familièrement". Cela signifie que les culs-sales qui s'imaginent débarquer ici et me tutoyer comme si nous avions gardé les piquets de grève ensemble verront leur contribution à la conversation éradiquée sans autre forme de procès. Quelle que soit la pertinence de ladite contribution. Même si vous n'êtes Vraiment Pas Content® avec ce que j'écris, cela ne vous dispense pas de surveiller vos manières : tant que je n'ai pas été présenté à votre chère Maman, nous nous vouvoierons. Vu ?
  2. Évitez le hors-sujet. Si vous avez une rancune à l'égard de l'impact des pets de vache sur le changement climatique et que cet article traite de la fessée de macaque(1), alors ce n'est pas l'endroit d'où lancer votre croisade (2).
    Je n'ai rien contre une conversation à bâtons rompus, mais si c'est hors-sujet ET stupide ou insultant, ça aura une durée de vie salement limitée.
  3. Considérez les deux affirmations suivantes...
    • J'ai une ouverture d'esprit totale en ce qui concerne toutes idées rationnelles.
    • Il est évident qu' Anti-américanisme, anti-Sémitisme, Islamisme, Nationalisme, Racisme, Collectivisme(3) et Multiculturalisme (liste non-exhaustive) existent en complète contradiction avec la Raison.
    ... Et tâchez de devinez la dose totale de tolérance que vous pouvez attendre de moi si vous cédez à l'une de ces sirènes.
  4. Si vous deviez cependant persister dans ces voies, comprenez que je ne dépense pas un nombre incalculable d'heures de travail sur ce site pour vous "tendre la main", "débattre" avec vous, "comprendre" vos "causes profondes" ou "apprendre à connaitre" votre religion. Contrairement à la race, l'idéologie est le résultat de nos choix, et nous devons en supporter l'entière responsabilité. J'abhorre votre mentalité tarée, et ce que vous défendez et promouvez. J'ai entendu toutes vos pitoyables excuses pour votre détestable psyché de totalitaire et votre compulsion à forcer et réduire vos semblables en esclavage au nom d'un quelconque "intérêt général".
    Comprenez donc que ceci n'est pas un forum publique : c'est mon avant-poste dans la guerre culturelle que vous lancez contre moi, mes semblables, mes droits et ma liberté — vous ne serez que toléré ici, et seulement si je le décide. Je tire les ficelles, et ne vous doit rien. En fait je n'aime pas vous voir dans le coin, et en conséquence les seuls arguments de ma part auxquels vous puissiez réellement prétendre, si vous insistez, se transmettent par le canon de ma carabine de fort calibre Sig-Sauer(4) — Parce dès qu'ils s'agit d'ordures intolérantes, je suis un salaud d'intolérant.
    Alors gardez vos distances, et personne ne sera blessé.
  5. J'ai aussi un patience très limitée pour les sociaux-démocrates de toute confession et couleur, les centristes-du-centre fruits de l'union d'une méduse et d'un cul de singe, les Libertarés de l'École Rothbard conditionnés au "C'est la faute à l'Amérique, toujours et partout", Les Idiots d'Hollywood et les Crétins-de-Cannes, de même que ces parisiens qui se prennent pour une élite alors qu'ils ne sont que les bouseux du monde développé (5). J'ai cependant tendance à les ignorer, et ils peuvent donc s'estimer chanceux s'ils arrivent à me soutirer ne serait-ce qu'un sarcasme en langage fleuri.
  6. Ouais, et ne me lancez pas sur les journalistes et le Monde Merveilleux des Medias...
  7. Les soldats Américains et Britanniques (parmi lesquels j'inclue le Commonwealth) prennent place sur un piédestal particulier dans mon panthéon personnel. Manquez leur de respect ici, et vous souhaiterez rapidement vous trouver plutôt à la Mecque en période Hajj, tout nu avec seulement une pancarte autour du coup sur laquelle on puisse lire "Mahomet était un pédophile".
  8. Je peux modérer, supprimer ou éditer quoi que ce soit, sans fournir d'excuses ni d'explications. Cela n'a rien à voir avec de la “censure”, pour une raison très simple : je ne suis pas un État, vous n'êtes pas un citoyen opprimé dudit État et demeurez donc libre de vous exprimer sur votre propre support et par vos propres moyens. Commenter n'est pas un droit, c'est un privilège que j'accorde ou refuse selon mon droit de propriétaire des lieux.
  9. Mon site n'est pas affreusement partial, il est impudemment orienté. Si vous êtes de mon côté, vous avez mon aval et êtes libre de disserter à l'envi. Sinon, faites avec ou allez crever dans le caniveau.
  10. Oh, et si vous êtes végétarien, sachez que je chasse, tue, cuisine(6) et bouffe toutes sortes d'animaux, et que j'apprécie le tout sans aucune retenue. Soyez heureux avec vos carottes Docteur.
  1. C'est déjà arrivé.
  2. C'est aussi valable pour le Livre d'Or.
  3. Ce qui inclue aussi ses variantes : Socialisme, National-Socialisme, Communisme, Fascisme, etc.
  4. Avec un gros 'Bang'
  5. Londres, New-York, Sydney ou Tokyo, d'accord. Mais Paris, c'est un bled de cul-terreux.
  6. Généralement avec une sauce au vin, ou alors des poignées d'épices à t'arracher la tripaille. Le raisin et les piments, ça compte comme trucs de végétarien, non ?

Help

  1. As an additional layer of defense against comment spamming and surf-by shooting, I enacted a set of restrictions on how you can post a comment as a simple guest on my site (i.e. either when you're not registered as a member, or registered but not logged in), starting with pre-publishing comment approval. As approving comments will take a certain — and variable — amount of time, I invite you to check-in if you're serious about joigning the conversation in real time.
  2. Non-authenticated users are also limited to the following HTML tags:
    • Bold (<strong></strong>)
    • Italic (<em></em>)
    • Underline (<u></u>)
    • Quote (<blockquote></blockquote>)
    Don't bother entering any other tags, as they will automagically get stripped on posting.
  3. Members have access to a greater range of tags and publishing tools, and they can also choose to be informed by email of follow-up comments, for any given thread.
  4. Members also have an easier and more straightforward posting process. Some of the system defenses are lowered for them, and the details fields (name, etc.) are pre-filled with the information they entered in their profile.
  5. Members have a greater chance to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, while it will be assumed that, in addition to an opinion, strangers have stinky feet and greasy fingers. They may therefore be regarded with great condescension by regular members and the dissident frogman alike, and derided accordingly. So wash your feet, your hands, and register.
  6. A reminder: you decide what you write, no matter how brilliant or stupid it might be, and the fact that I let it go published doesn't mean I condone, agree or disagree with it—no matter if I answer it or not. Hey, you're supposed to be a responsible adult, right?

If you need further help with the site, you may want to check the Field Manual. Ultimately, you can also drop me a line. I usually don't answer jellyfish and buttermonkey(1) hybrids however.

  1. Nope, don't know what species is that either, but it does sound like a particularly vile creature, doesn't it?
  1. En défense contre le spam et les tirs isolés, j'ai établi un ensemble de restrictions sur l'ajout de commentaires par les simples visiteurs sur le site (i.e. soit lorsque vous n'êtes pas enregistré comme membre, soit lorsque vous l'êtes, mais n'avez pas ouvert une session), dont notamment la modération avant publication. L’approbation des commentaires prenant un temps certain et variable, je vous invite donc à vous inscrire, si vous envisagez sérieusement de participer à la conversation en temps réel.
  2. Les utilisateurs non authentifiés sont également limités aux balises HTML suivantes :
    • Gras (<strong></strong>)
    • Italique (<em></em>)
    • Souligné (<u></u>)
    • Citation (<blockquote></blockquote>)
    Ne vous fatiguez pas à en utiliser d'autres, le texte passe par un filtre de suppression lors de la publication.
  3. Les membres ont accès à une plus large sélection d'outils et de balises, et ils peuvent choisir pour chaque 'conversation' à laquelle ils prennent part d'être informé par email des réponses.
  4. Les membres ont également un "processus de publication" plus simple et direct. Certaines défenses du système sont abaissées pour eux, et les champs des détails sont pré-remplis avec les informations qu'ils ont entré dans leur profil.
  5. Les membres ont une plus grande chance d'entrer au Royaume des Cieux, tandis que l'on considèrera que, en sus d'une opinion, les visiteurs venus d'ailleurs ont les doigts gras et les pieds sales. Ils pourront de ce fait être traité avec grande condescendance par les autres membres et le dissident frogman de même, et ridiculisés en conséquence. Alors lavez vos mains, vos pieds, et inscrivez-vous.
  6. Pour mémoire : vous décidez de ce que vous écrivez, aussi brillant ou stupide que cela soit, et le fait que j'en autorise la publication ne signifie pas que je l'approuve ou le désapprouve, et cela que j'y réponde ou non. Hé, vous êtes censé vous comporter en adulte responsable, s'pas ?

Si vous avez besoin de plus d'aide avec le site, jetez un œil au manuel d'instruction. Au pire, vous pouvez également m'envoyer un mot. J'ai cependant tendance à ne pas répondre aux fruits de l'union d'une méduse et d'un cul de singe.

Comments | Commentaires

TooTall | 3 months ago
Avatar for TooTall
United States
In: Utah
04/14 2008
01:48 PM

The American Indians found the hands and feet of bears to be quite a delicacy.  The "paws that refreshes" if you’ll pardon the pun.


Mikael | 3 months ago
Avatar for Mikael
Denmark
Website
04/14 2008
02:16 PM

While on the - rather gross - subject, don’t ever never eat dogs liver either.


2hotel9 | 3 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
04/14 2008
02:34 PM

A new edition to my library, always looking for good info!

 

An anecdote, a man I served with was stationed in Alaska, working on remote radar installations in the ‘60s. He and another soldier were attacked by a polar bear. Troop A emptied his .45 into bear. No effect. Jack put 20 rds from his M16 into said bear, bear firmly grasped Troop A by the neck and dragged him away. Jack promptly requested transfer, to anywhere not Alaska. He did 2 tours as a LRRP in the Central Highlands. No further trouble with polar bears. Though he did accidentally kill an elephant with a claymore mine. Oops.


mycroft69 | 3 months ago
Avatar for mycroft69
United States
In: Bristol, Vermont - United States
04/15 2008
10:49 AM

And again, DF, when are you getting your State of Montana hunting license and going after some elk?


2hotel9 | 3 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
04/15 2008
02:41 PM

Hey, don’t bogart the Frogman! He can hunt elk here in PA, too.


KL | 3 months ago
Avatar for KL
United States
Website
In: Ohio & Kentucky
04/16 2008
08:21 AM

Sorry to be a bit off point, but D. Frogman have you seen this articleon the arrest of an anti-Islam blogger in the UK?  Unbelievable.  More reason to take up our offers to come visit Vermont, Pennsylvania and Ohio or Kentucky and do some elk hunting or just start your own cable network tv channel/radio show.  :)  Seriously, if they arrest the Frogman, I’m going to be pissed and it will mark the beginning of the Caliphate of Londonistan.  Islam isn’t even a race!   


mycroft69 | 3 months ago
Avatar for mycroft69
United States
In: Bristol, Vermont - United States
04/16 2008
09:00 AM

Anti-Islam blogger in the UK? I wonder if DF has seen that Ms. Bardot has been slammed with another fine for offending Islam! Who would’ve thought she had it in her?

The only elk hunting in Vermont that DF might engage in would be shooting caged animals. Any elk around here are few and located on ranches. Nothing wild for sport. That’s why the western U.S. or Canada might appeal to him. But he’d have to stay for a couple weeks or more. It takes that long for one hungry guy to barbecue an entire elk carcass.


DaToad | 3 months ago
Avatar for DaToad
United States
In: Glendale, AZ, USA
04/17 2008
03:29 PM

The first thing I thought of when reading about eating polar bear meat was the book/movie, The Red Tent.

"One of the grandest adventure/survival films is one you’ve probably never heard of - “The Red Tent” - an oddball fusion of Italians and Soviet filmmakers with an all-star international cast and crew. It tells the true story of a failed Italian expedition to the North Pole via airship in 1928. The great Soviet filmmaker Mikhail Kalatozov directs his first and last English language film with complete authenticity. Other than the completely realistic arctic disaster story the film is a powerful story of ambition, greed, international politics, heroism and cowardice." - Alan Bacchus

They kill and eat a polar bear to survive. I don’t remember if they cooked it or not.

While I don’t think Bridget Bardot would like anyone killing and eating polar bears, as long as she continues her islam bashing ways, she’s OK in my book.


2hotel9 | 3 months ago
Avatar for 2hotel9
United States
In: Western Pennsylvania
04/17 2008
04:32 PM

Bridget basically smacks everyone equally. EEOC and all that, doncha’ know!


VladMartel | 3 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed VladMartel
France
04/18 2008
01:14 PM

Hi dissident frogman. why are you a traitor? why are you an unloyal person? Why do you like to bash your ancestors?

 

I’m looking forward your next news, In order to debunk your biased and foolish mind.


mycroft69 | 3 months ago
Avatar for mycroft69
United States
In: Bristol, Vermont - United States
04/18 2008
01:59 PM

Oh, great. DF, ya got a Marxist infiltrator on board! Someone break out the steaks!


Frozen Tex | 3 months ago
Avatar for Frozen Tex
Canada
In: Yellowknife, NT, Canada
04/18 2008
02:29 PM

Hmmm… I’ve had Moose, Caribou, Musk Ox, Char… No Polar Bear yet, though.


Frozen Tex | 3 months ago
Avatar for Frozen Tex
Canada
In: Yellowknife, NT, Canada
04/18 2008
03:22 PM

And what’s Al’s deal with Polar Bears not swimming? They’re classed by some as aquatic mammals, fer cryin’ out loud!


VladMartel | 3 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed VladMartel
France
04/18 2008
03:23 PM

Oh great, because I hate the traitors and the deluded morons, I suddenly became a marxist.


the dissident frogman | 3 months ago
Avatar for the dissident frogman
Website
04/18 2008
03:52 PM
Comment 3411

Mycroft69:in fact, this one has been around for some time but (until now) never got around registering.

I consistently sent his ludicrous rants on my "betrayal de la patrie" down where the pointless pixels go to die; I guess it frustrated him enough to learn what "comment moderation" means. He apparently doesn’t realize that just because members’ comments don’t get held in the moderation queue doesn’t mean he’s got a free ride to pollute my property and annoy my guests. He’ll learn as soon as he becomes more annoying than (involuntarily) amusing.

He’s French, unsurprisingly, and a patron of (French) Internet Service Provider Free (www.free.fr - Spam/Abuse requests: mailto:abuse@proxad.net)—The things one learns, when one knows a bit about how things works under the hood…

Incidentally, judging by the content of some his previous "comments" and the care with which he constructed his nickname, I suspect he’s more of the French Nationalist/Sovereignist/Fascist branch of despicable morons rather than the Marxist one, though that is really just a technicality.

In the end, Nationalists, Marxists and Islamists are just heinous Collectivists, with far more in common than any of these idiots can reckon.

I confess that over the years, it’s been my pride and honor to find myself at the receiving end of these f***ers’ (pardon my French) bitter comments, hurled abuses and other death threats - you know you’re walking the right path when all the enemies of freedom stand on the roadside throwing stones.


VladMartel | 3 months ago
Official DF Readerchimp rep.
Don't feed VladMartel
France
04/18 2008
04:22 PM

Now [Edited, clueless - DF]? [Edited, pointless - DF]? lol [Edited, the heck does that mean anyway? - DF].

Traitorous [Edited, tired, old, silly National Front type of rant. Oh, and seriously clumsy English - DF]

btw, [Edited, now that wasn’t any sort of known articulated language, wasn’t it? - DF]

NOTICE: Dear Member, your membership has just been promoted to the “Overwatched” group. Thank you for commenting at the dissident frogman.


the dissident frogman | 3 months ago
Avatar for the dissident frogman
Website
04/18 2008
04:45 PM
Comment 3413

KL: I heard briefly about the Lionheart blog and its owner around January, when he allegedly received a letter from “the police”. I must confess I found there were some inconsistencies in his story, and after reading through a fair bit of his blog, found that some of his posts had sometimes a bit of a, I don’t know, “weird” tone (But then, looks who’s speaking) - notably the parts on his “former identity”.

In any case, that’s definitely not a cause for arrest in a supposedly free country like Britain—if he has indeed been arrested, that’s frankly beyond belief.

Then again, in contemporary Britain, a pack of “Asians” (lead by one multi-recidivist “wannabe militant" carrying a screensaver of the collapse of the WTC on his mobile phone), can assault a “gora” (white) schoolboy with red hair, yelling “that’s what you call Paki-bashing” while smashing his skull with a claw hammer - and not raise much of a fuss from the Police and the School’s administration (well, at least they’re being prosecuted...) > Mother slams multiculturalism as cause of Asian bullying of her son

So what’s a blogger’s freedom of speech in all that?

Update: and then, there’s this. I never thought I would write that, but I rather fear Britain fares worse than even France in the struggle against the Islamic fifth column - for the moment at least…


Proof | 3 months ago
Avatar for Proof
United States
Website
In: Twinsburg, Ohio, USA
04/19 2008
11:43 AM

"why are you a traitor? "

Frogman: What does the flea bitten chimp have against free speech?  (And perhaps, someone could buy it a dictionary - assuming it knows how to read!)


Proof | 3 months ago
Avatar for Proof
United States
Website
In: Twinsburg, Ohio, USA
04/19 2008
12:00 PM

"He’ll learn as soon as he becomes more annoying than (involuntarily) amusing."

Since Bill Clinton was the one who claimed to smoke pot, but "Never inhaled", perhaps we could call him:

Vlad, the Inhaler?


TooTall | 3 months ago
Avatar for TooTall
United States
In: Utah
04/20 2008
09:54 AM

Like DF I find his postings somewhat amusing in a childish sort of way (at least for now) but I can only wonder why he chose a thread about the food chain to post.  Is there some deep inner meaning that I’m missing?


Comment page 1 / 1 pages |

Trackbacks

Post title: Plat du Jour

Date: 14th April, 2008