Bad Juju! You no logged in or no introduced to the frogman. Log-in or register. Or suffer mucho hoo-doos.
Published and printed from http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com. All rights reserved. Commercial and/or derivative use without our agreement is restricted.
Next entry | Previous entry
Font size · Taille du texte Normal . Large
You're reading the print-optimized version of the dissident frogman's weblog. It's fine by me, but keep in mind that you're missing some of the content and most of the functionalities. So in case you arrived here via an external link and want the best value for your clicks, the full frogman for this page is over there.
Vous lisez la version optimisée pour l'impression du blog du dissident frogman. Pas de problème, mais soyez conscient que vous loupez un peu de contenu et beaucoup de fonctionalités. Dans le cas où vous êtes arrivés ici via un lien externe et en vouliez plus pour vos clicks, le "full frogman" pour cette page est là.

21st

11/2007

9 months, 2 weeks, 1 Day, 7 hours, 12 minutes ago...

Mind the terminology, if you please
the dissident frogman • Wednesday, November 21, 2007 · 1436 zulu time | In France

The BBC email alert relating this bit of news came formatted as follow:

France's ex-President Jacques Chirac is placed under formal investigation over funding scandal when he was Paris mayor, his lawyer says.

Everybody let's scoff: scandal?

That's no funding scandal Mr. BBC, that's a good old-fashioned fraud.

The scandal is that Chirac's multiple scams were not put under any serious investigation sooner(1), even though nobody across the whole political spectrum, in the press and on the streets ignored that Chirac was a top dog in that fetid pool of corruption that is the French political class(2).

But then, what can you expect when the judiciary is appointed by and under the orders of the politics?