Rather than give the Waffle SS fan club all the attention they seek—and therefore far more than they deserve—with their mendacious exercise in ellipsis bordering on calumny—truly, if my experience serves, a predictable trademark of each and every sh* for brains Old World Collectivist—I'd like to:

Thank Charles Johnson and Little Green Footballs for following up on the sudden and treacherous Fall Gelb redux, and,

Point everybody interested in the real, structural problem (we) Europeans will have to acknowledge and tackle before any true progress can be achieved against the Islamization of our continent, towards that article from Robert Spencer who, far more eloquently than I could, details what I only touched in my post on Brigitte Bardot vs. the MRAP: "Why the anti-jihad resistance is not about race".

Here's a few quotes I selected that, unlike the Waffle SS fan club's deliberate misquoting of my own post, is representative of Mr. Spencer's argument:

A race-based approach to the anti-jihad resistance is harmful in a number of ways: It's the wrong way to fight the global jihad. The jihad is not a race, Islam is not a race, Muslims are not all of one race. The issues between the Islamic world and non-Muslims are not racial. They are about religious supremacism. Bringing in race just confuses the issue, and allows jihadists and their de facto allies among the Eurabian elites to claim that this whole thing is about racism.

(…) This approach hamstrings and marginalizes the anti-jihad movement. Many people who oppose the Islamization of Europe will never join with a race-based party to do so. Hugh Fitzgerald and I have often commented here over the years about the tragedy in Europe: the mainstream political parties have completely abdicated any responsibility to deal with the Islamization of Europe, thus leaving the field open to groups that obscure the issue with racial politics.

(…) Many […] people have written here […] that the parties that speak of race are the only ones in Europe that are doing anything to resist Islamization, and thus they deserve the support of all those who believe there is something worth defending in Western non-Muslim civilization. I don't think that is any sounder an argument than the claim that we must support Hizballah because it builds schools and runs charities when not lobbing rockets at Israeli civilians.

(…) Also, people I respect have pointed out that European culture is being overwhelmed and transformed by out-of-control Muslim immigration, and there is nothing wrong with defending it from that. I agree. But while culture has a racial component, culture and race are not identical. To reduce culture to race on a continent that has seen six million sacrificed to the idolatry of race and blood is not, in my view, the right way to defend European culture -- and there must be articulated a sane and moral alternative that is clearly distinct from that and rejects it utterly. Geert Wilders in the Netherlands has managed to mount a strong stance against Islamization while avoiding dalliance with racial groups.

Read it all, because that's what we really have to work on before we can claim to defend true Western values of tolerance from becoming the abject drift towards Dhimmitude so many European countries indulge into, without adding another dark page to our continent's bloody record of ethnic cleansing and political genocide.

"No tolerance for intolerance" knows no skin color, and I shall never let any goose-stepping wannabe doubt or hijack what I meant when I created these banners.

(For those who wonder what I mean by "Waffle SS fan club", please check update number 2 to my brief on the BB Goon—Sorry for the extra clicks this requires, but I'm way over my supremacist loverboys-linking quota, and won't send them more Google juice.)