As of June 2007, I have redesigned and relaunched the site at www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog
This page won’t be updated anymore, and remains here for archiving purposes. After all, that’s a piece of my history.

I’m just next door, really. I have consolidated all the content of the site since 2002, and I’m running on a much improved software.

Please update bookmarks and blogrolls:
http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com (preferred)
or
http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog

See you there.

A compter de juin 2007, j'ai redesigné et relancé le site en www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog
Cette page ne sera plus mise à jour, et demeure à titre d'archive. Après tout, c'est un morceau de mon histoire.

Je ne suis pas loin, vraiment. J'ai consolidé tout le contenu depuis 2002, et je tourne sur un logiciel bien plus amélioré.

Merci de mettre à jour bookmarks et blogrolls:
http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com (de préférence)
ou
http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/blog

Rendez-vous là-bas.

Previous: We're next Buddy • On Est Les Suivants mes amis
Home
Next: Covering Fire • Tir de couverture

June 13, 2003

Parisian Carrion • Parigots, Têtes de Veaux

Fired from France by the dissident frogman

Le Parisien is the first daily newspaper for Paris and its region.

   Le Parisien's ethics:
« We commit ourselves to the respect of editorial rules (...) such as doing our best to verify the validity of the informations, live by the rules of journalistic deontology, avoiding to attempt to the rights and dignity of the persons (...) »
 
Le Parisien's article:
« (...) this son of an algerian worker also extoled a radical islam towards adepts he met at the Nanterre mosque he's been frequenting assiduously for 15 years. Through the «Muslim Association» of La Garenne-Colombes, of which he's the founding president, he also openly approved the palestinian Hamas, the islamic resistance movement. »
Emphasis by myself.

An act of "resistance" by the Hamas:


It's cheaper to write about ethics than to live up to it.

Hypocrite people? Tell me about it.
Le Parisien est le premier quotidien de Paris et sa région.

   L'éthique du Parisien :
« Nous nous engageons notamment à respecter les règles éditoriales (...) à faire le maximum pour vérifier la validité des informations, respecter les règles de la déontologie journalistique, ne pas porter atteinte aux droits et à la dignité des personnes »
L'article du Parisien :
« (...) ce fils d'ouvrier algérien prônait aussi un islam radical auprès d'adeptes rencontrés à la mosquée de Nanterre qu'il fréquentait assidûment depuis quinze ans. Et cautionnait ouvertement, à travers la «Muslim Association» de La Garenne-Colombes, dont il était le président fondateur, le Hamas palestinien, mouvement de la résistance islamique. »
Surligné par moi-même.

Un acte de "résistance" du Hamas:


Il en coûte beaucoup moins de parler d'éthique que de s'y tenir.

Peuple d'hypocrites? Sans déconner.

Comments

American press is no better. And possibly worse.

And while I do like our president very much, I am extremely angry about the hypocritical mixed messages his administration has been sending to Israel.

How can people refer to that as "resistance"?

Posted by: Demosthenes | June 13, 2003 10:05 PM

Well, I'd say the message is not that mixed anymore:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52419-2003Jun12.html

The man is genuinely honest.

Posted by: the dissident frogman | June 13, 2003 10:14 PM

The American Media, with very few exceptions, casts Israel as the "evildoers" in virtually all of these atrocities. The average American is fed a steady diet of Palestinian victims and the English words of Yasser Arafat.

Posted by: Sociopathocracy | June 14, 2003 04:24 PM

Well ! What a weird blog ! It's well done, but I'm asking myself "What the hell are you talking about ?"
I spend lot of time in your country, and I noticed that most of your compatriots thought that we don't have fridge, and that we don't clean ourselves... I think they should read more, it's not because your own history is so short, that you don't have to learn about other countries. We might be "the old Europe", we don't wait for you to grow up.
Let me refresh your feeling about the situation : American people don't come to Paris anymore, ok, but the entire world desert your country... You don't say "french fries" anymore ! We don't go to your "Mac Duck" anymore !! We eat frog's legs, but we don't wear white hood to thank's black people for having helped us to build our nation.
Well, I love your country anyway, my familly is still there, and many friends of mine. But please, take a look at what is becomming Afganistan since the "War" against ben laden... Talibans are still making law over there !
You show skulls in your banner, but I don't remember, are you still Killing people in many states ?
My cousin works close to the "Twins", when I heard about what happened, I shit in my pants, I thought it was justify to try to kill, then judge ben laden and his frinds. But, did we maked it ? Where is he ? Can you, in your own conscience, say it's a succes ? I don't think so ! What is he preparing for us ? Did we catch hussen ? So what ?
I don't think I'm an hypocrite... But, be carrefull Froggy, not to be a fanatic yourself !
Olive (I hope you will find that post stupid enought to let it be)

Posted by: Olive | June 16, 2003 10:38 AM

#4:
Indeed, "stupid" is the word I was looking for.

Thanks for your help.

Posted by: the dissident frogman | June 16, 2003 11:12 AM


Jesus fucking Christ !!

Sociopathocracy, are you fucking kidding me ??
The mainstream media in america is definitely biased in favor of israel,
exactly like the french media is biased towards Palestine.
I'm not saying it's a bad thing that the US media supports Israel,
but where the hell have you seen it taking side for Palestinians
(apart from Indymedia which has such a "liberal"bias that it
sounds like pure propaganda, but that's not mainstream media anyway).

What I'd like to see is some really objective non biased information
regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict. So far, everybody I've been
discussing about it with had already chosen a side and was so blinded
in their own beliefs that it was just like talking about religion with a
islamist fanatic (or a Bible belt christian for that matter).

Le Mauj

Posted by: Le Mauj | June 19, 2003 03:31 AM

Where do you see a pro-Israel bias (save for Fox, NYPost, Wash Times)?

The New York Times loves to stick it to Israel every chance it gets (check out timeswatch.org for more info).

The Jennings/Rather/Brokaw troika dispense pro-Palestinian propaganda on a nightly basis.

That Ammanpour broad from CNN looks like she's ready to go down on Arafat every time she interviews him.

Where's the pro-Israeli bias?

Posted by: What? | June 19, 2003 07:49 AM

The way things are going, one day soon we could hear the following Last Words from the Arab Man on the Street:

"ABDUL WHAT'S THAT FLA -- .................."

--
Got change for 10 million people?

Posted by: Macker | June 19, 2003 05:43 PM