TrackBacks
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Safety Rigor • Carcan de Sureté:
» Safety Rigor • Carcan de Sureté from the dissident frogman's Propaganda Bureau
You know you can count on me to give a hand (It's a figure of speech. Got it? A friggin' figure of speech all right?) whenever a benevolent and deserving structure, state, church, NGO or any other of those "Let... [Read More]
Tracked on April 19, 2004 12:05 AM
Comments
From the article: His comments followed a BBC documentary in which he said the Catholic Church "advises against people infected with HIV wearing contraceptives".
Oh. My. God. Must be something in the holy water that makes their brains degenerate... Heaven help us.
Your condoms are a holy (see hole-y) riot.
Give us this day our daily condom
Which protects us apparently from nothing...
;)
Valerie
Posted by:
Valerie |
October 14, 2003 12:59 PM
Papertiger, the author ot that comment is is the lady you need to compliment and to whom you should direct your Pave inquiries. (Yes that is THE Valerie.)
DF can we clone you? I baptized my monitor in coffee when I saw the "collection".
Posted by:
Valerie, but not THE |
October 14, 2003 05:06 PM
THE unique VALkyrie:
Why would you want a clone when the original is available?
And but, but but...I believe you told me once that you wouldn't visit the dacha BEFORE your morning coffe?
Shall I add a disclaimer somewhere?
Let me see... Spilled liquids and cloning right? Okay, that should go as "Don't expose the frogman to bright lights, don't wet him down and ABOVE ALL don't feed him after Midnight"
Kingston Falls, here I am.
Posted by:
the dissident frogman |
October 14, 2003 05:28 PM
The more I read about Catholicism the more my self hatred grows. What in the hell does the Catholic Church really think it's going to accomplish by [i]dissuading against[/i] people with HIV and AIDS from wearing condoms? Are they just trying to get the sinners to hell that much quicker? I'm just thankful that I'm not a very good Catholic; it lessens my culpability somewhat.
Maybe the church should be cleaning it's own house by coming down on some of these pedophile priests rather than spreading the message that condoms are for the wicked and making edicts against Israelis defending themselves.
On second thought, maybe I could scrap Catholicism altogether and just convert to Judaism. Does anyone know if they're still drinking the blood of Christian babies?
Posted by:
Hank Scorpio |
October 14, 2003 07:10 PM
Children ride faster when they wear bicycle helmets. People drive faster when they wear seatbelts. Police officers are braver when they have bullet resistant vests. Tank crews are more bold in battle because they have 11 inches of steel in front of them.
The sexual revolution began when antibiotics could cure syphillis, and hit the brakes when HIV began taking its toll.
Condoms provide about 90% protection from HIV. On the other hand, if the risk per sexual contact is lower, then people will engage in sexual contact more often. In fact people will tend to have 10 times as much sex if they think that sex is 1/10th as risky. If they think there might be something behind this alarm, they may lower their risk meter, achieving two goals: less risky behavior, and less acceptance of immoral behavior. Who know, the Catholic Church may even achieve a reawakening of virtue among Catholics~!
Posted by:
Don Meaker |
October 15, 2003 04:39 AM
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/04/01/1048962756432.html
A bestseller. Surely.
Posted by:
Valerie |
October 15, 2003 09:47 AM